Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
News Biden* Took ‘Classified’ Documents, 2nd Stash House Discovered
Author Message
CrimsonPhantom Offline
CUSA Curator
*

Posts: 41,931
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 2401
I Root For: NM State
Location:
Post: #541
RE: Biden* Took ‘Classified’ Documents, 2nd Stash House Discovered
02-01-2023 05:21 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Eagleaidaholic Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,118
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 781
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location:
Post: #542
RE: Biden* Took ‘Classified’ Documents, 2nd Stash House Discovered
Transparency. How long before they just come out and say, "PFuck you, we don't want to answer that". When was the last time Joe Biden answered a reporter's question?
02-01-2023 05:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Hambone10 Offline
Hooter
*

Posts: 40,333
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation: 1293
I Root For: My Kids
Location: Right Down th Middle

New Orleans BowlDonatorsThe Parliament Awards
Post: #543
RE: Biden* Took ‘Classified’ Documents, 2nd Stash House Discovered
It is ridiculous to assert that the moment an attorney found an 'illegal' document, they stopped what they were doing and reported themselves. It is vastly more realistic to think that they stopped what they were doing and began looking for other classified documents before/while alerting authorities. Attorney's don't like to ask questions they don't already know the answer to... and it would border on malpractice for them to allow a search of documents, not knowing what else was there and what they might need to 'explain'. I mean, if they stopped digging and reported themselves... and when investigators came in they discovered nuclear launch codes... Biden would be cricified. No attorney would let their client be crucified.

But that isn't the crime. The crime is the retention of classified documents... and this is fairly set in stone to be a violation... AND the failure to secure them... since it seems literally nobody looked at them for 5 years.

Besides... does anyone really believe that $200/hr 'big firm' associates (much less $500+/hr attorneys) were the ones digging through documents?? At best it was a $50/hr legal assistant.... but again, why was an attorney looking through old stored documents??

The whole thing is a lie
02-02-2023 03:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofMstateU Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 39,240
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation: 3580
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #544
RE: Biden* Took ‘Classified’ Documents, 2nd Stash House Discovered
02-02-2023 03:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Eagleaidaholic Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,118
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 781
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location:
Post: #545
RE: Biden* Took ‘Classified’ Documents, 2nd Stash House Discovered
(02-02-2023 03:05 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  It is ridiculous to assert that the moment an attorney found an 'illegal' document, they stopped what they were doing and reported themselves. It is vastly more realistic to think that they stopped what they were doing and began looking for other classified documents before/while alerting authorities. Attorney's don't like to ask questions they don't already know the answer to... and it would border on malpractice for them to allow a search of documents, not knowing what else was there and what they might need to 'explain'. I mean, if they stopped digging and reported themselves... and when investigators came in they discovered nuclear launch codes... Biden would be cricified. No attorney would let their client be crucified.

But that isn't the crime. The crime is the retention of classified documents... and this is fairly set in stone to be a violation... AND the failure to secure them... since it seems literally nobody looked at them for 5 years.

Besides... does anyone really believe that $200/hr 'big firm' associates (much less $500+/hr attorneys) were the ones digging through documents?? At best it was a $50/hr legal assistant.... but again, why was an attorney looking through old stored documents??

The whole thing is a lie
and who paid for these "attorneys" to pack up an office? Better not be the tax payers.
02-02-2023 04:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.