(08-08-2023 09:11 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-08-2023 04:04 AM)JRsec Wrote:  

(08-08-2023 03:36 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  In his mind he thinks he’s getting over on people. Amazing.

Way too much credit here! He just enjoys pissing people off. End of story. Contract law means he can't be Perry Mason. It's plodding and dull with attention to minutia a must. He's taking out his pent-up frustrations on the board. His positions aren't even skin deep but are intended to scratch you! The internet is full of them. You should ignore them, and they will get tired and go somewhere else.

Lolz at the 'professional' psychiatrist.

The added portion of pulling assumptions out of thin air about someone completely unknown to them is quite the nice touch.

I would call it a Profile of someone that is eristic.

(08-07-2023 10:18 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 04:52 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 02:35 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 09:06 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  The Trump plan all along in these purple battleground states was to contest the validity of the popular vote & push the certification back to the republican controlled state legislatures. Had it been successful, every presidential election from this point forward would be decided by the VP & partisan state legislatures.

But it wasn’t successful. So nothing changed………except now every presidential election will be followed by prosecution of your political adversaries, destruction of executive privilege and the criminalization of legal advice that doesn’t fit said winners ideals.

My advice is dont try and change electoral votes by the VP simply by fiat, and for no reason aside that they are voting against you.

If that happens, no prosecution, no criminal conspiracies to pierce the executive privilege, and no legal advice that self-admittedly breaks the law.

Easy peasy. You know -- like every Presidential election loser did under the law since the beginning of the country. Imagine that.

I guess you forgot that road in your rhetorical squeal of pain above.

Quote:It wasnt successful

Still a crime though. The 'it wasnt successful' thingy is never a good bet on a legal defense to a criminal charge. Especially those starting out with the word 'conspiracy' or those starting out with the word 'attempt'. Imagine that.

I can imagine your wife telling you to put a sock in it. My guess is she left a long time ago or never existed. Politics makes for strange people. You missed your calling. Instead of closing loans you should have gone into politics. You’re long winded. Don’t accept that anyone can have a different opinion. Are not at all embarrassed to be wrong. Can’t let a single issue go. Will not let the last word go without comment. Have a serious narcissistic personality. And probably wouldn’t be embarrassed when you farted on tv in an interview. You got bug eyes? A pencil neck? Yeah you would make a great addition to Schiff, Swallwell and AOC. Too bad Texas probably wouldn’t vote for your morally superior ass.

That certainly sums it up quite well

(08-08-2023 10:58 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 10:18 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 04:52 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 02:35 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(08-07-2023 09:06 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  The Trump plan all along in these purple battleground states was to contest the validity of the popular vote & push the certification back to the republican controlled state legislatures. Had it been successful, every presidential election from this point forward would be decided by the VP & partisan state legislatures.

But it wasn’t successful. So nothing changed………except now every presidential election will be followed by prosecution of your political adversaries, destruction of executive privilege and the criminalization of legal advice that doesn’t fit said winners ideals.

My advice is dont try and change electoral votes by the VP simply by fiat, and for no reason aside that they are voting against you.

If that happens, no prosecution, no criminal conspiracies to pierce the executive privilege, and no legal advice that self-admittedly breaks the law.

Easy peasy. You know -- like every Presidential election loser did under the law since the beginning of the country. Imagine that.

I guess you forgot that road in your rhetorical squeal of pain above.

Quote:It wasnt successful

Still a crime though. The 'it wasnt successful' thingy is never a good bet on a legal defense to a criminal charge. Especially those starting out with the word 'conspiracy' or those starting out with the word 'attempt'. Imagine that.

I can imagine your wife telling you to put a sock in it. My guess is she left a long time ago or never existed. Politics makes for strange people. You missed your calling. Instead of closing loans you should have gone into politics. You’re long winded. Don’t accept that anyone can have a different opinion. Are not at all embarrassed to be wrong. Can’t let a single issue go. Will not let the last word go without comment. Have a serious narcissistic personality. And probably wouldn’t be embarrassed when you farted on tv in an interview. You got bug eyes? A pencil neck? Yeah you would make a great addition to Schiff, Swallwell and AOC. Too bad Texas probably wouldn’t vote for your morally superior ass.

That certainly sums it up quite well

Except for the wife part

The trio of Beavis's speak in tandem. Great discussion of the issues. Dont strain yourselves too hard in the 'whiny as fk' namecalling that doubles as discussion for you dudes.

(08-08-2023 12:38 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  The trio of Beavis's speak in tandem. Great discussion of the issues. Dont strain yourselves too hard in the 'whiny as fk' namecalling that doubles as discussion for you dudes.

Just checked. The judge says Hunter Bidens lawyers still cant contact the clerk directly, no matter how many people work in that law firm.

(08-08-2023 12:44 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-08-2023 12:38 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  The trio of Beavis's speak in tandem. Great discussion of the issues. Dont strain yourselves too hard in the 'whiny as fk' namecalling that doubles as discussion for you dudes.

Just checked. The judge says Hunter Bidens lawyers still cant contact the clerk directly, no matter how many people work in that law firm.

Just checked -- I never made a comment on that case the way you have noted previously.

Just checked -- the number of people at the firm had nothing to do with that issue as well.

Can you even read or comprehend basic English? Maybe try and get something, anything, correct in that matter. Good grief.