Quote:Christians have voiced their reactions to a fabricated Bible verse, reportedly produced by ChatGPT, which suggests Jesus’ acceptance of trans-identified individuals.

A Reddit user, known as Psychological_Dog527, admitted to feeling despondent when they prompted ChatGPT to generate this “fake biblical passage” about “Jesus accepting trans people.” Psychological_Dog527 then shared this on the “r/trans” subreddit. “I know it’s not real, but it gave me some comfort,” the user conveyed.

“And a woman, whose heart was divided between spirit and body, came before him,” the fabricated passage reads. “In quiet despair, she asked, ‘Lord, I come to you estranged, for my spirit and body are not one. How shall I hope to enter the kingdom of God?'”

“Jesus looked upon her with kindness, replying, ‘my child, blessed are those who strive for unity within themselves, for they shall know the deepest truths of my Father’s creation,'” the passage continued. “Be not afraid, for in the kingdom of God, there is no man nor woman, as all are one in spirit. The gates of my Father’s kingdom will open for those who love and are loved, for God looks not upon the body, but the heart.”

The Advocate, a pro-LGBT outlet, highlighted this “trans-affirming” “Bible verse” on August 16. They portrayed the passage as a beacon of tolerance for LGBTQ+ individuals who often feel alienated from religious communities due to a history of exclusion. The outlet further noted that while many on Reddit appreciated the AI-generated verse, several users felt that the essence of biblical stories might be “likely lost in translation.” The article emphasized the distinction between religious texts that subtly recognize gender-nonconforming individuals and those that overtly acknowledge multiple genders beyond the binary.

However, Christian scholars and pundits have voiced concerns about OpenAI’s generation of platitudinous pablum in which the son of man appears to endorse genital mutilation. Messianic Jewish author and radio host Michael Brown penned an op-ed in The Christian Post, providing his interpretation of Jesus’ teachings on gender and sexuality in contrast to the machine-generated excerpt.

“There is truth to the claim that in God’s kingdom there is neither male nor female … this doesn’t mean that gender distinctions should be blurred or transgressed,” Brown said. He asserted that Jesus would approach a trans-identifying individual with compassion, urging “followers of Jesus” to emulate this behavior. However, he meticulously dissected the claims presented in the AI-generated verse. Brown referenced Paul’s teachings in Galatians 3:28 and Colossians 3:11, emphasizing the absence of caste or class in God’s kingdom. “We are all equal in Jesus,” Brown declared.

He further argued that this equality doesn’t negate the reality of gender distinctions. Brown emphasized that the Bible, including the New Testament, differentiates between genders, offering specific guidance to husbands and wives and recognizing only two sexes. Brown firmly believed that Jesus would not have performed drastic physical alterations on someone grappling with Body Integrity Identity Disorder or transformed a “furry” into their animal counterpart. He contended that Jesus would not tell a woman, who felt she was a man, to “Be made whole,” and then surgically alter her. Instead, Brown believes Jesus would help her find peace with her natural body.

Brown concluded with a thought-provoking statement, challenging the notion that Jesus would perform miracles that align with contemporary identity disorders. He posited that Jesus would heal from within, rather than catering to external identities.

Link

This is the left's mentality; they gain comfort in being lied to.

again, who writes the al-gore-rhythms ... that's all one needs to know...

the avg human has the intelligence of a squid, the att'n span of a goldfish, and the social graces of a feral kitty...

#PTBarnumClan

This sounds like something Peloser would be throwing out there. They don't know the Bible but they consider themselves experts. You know like those idiots who want to change Latinos to Latinx.

I tell you Satan is having a hell day with these lost souls. He's loving it.

I've been seeing this pop up in my youtube recommendations for several days.

The entire NT is clear that the church age concludes with a massive falling away and apostasy in many "churches" at the end. Wow are we so clearly in the throws of that.

"Progressive" Christianity in all its forms = Falling away/apostasy

Satan used the same trick on the first two people that he's still using now... "Now what was it that God REALLY said???? hmmmm??"

(09-03-2023 02:14 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Satan used the same trick on the first two people that he's still using now... "Now what was it that God REALLY said???? hmmmm??"

Exactly.

Satan's first lie and deception against mankind was asking "Did god really say that?" and then suggestion God meant something very different than what He actually said.

THAT IS EXACTLY what people do with the Bible on every single issue now.

The one thing the lost and foolish agrees on is that the Bible never actually means what it says. It says X but it actually means Y and Z.

Virtually 99% of the Bible is NOT a parable, its literal. But people always point to the 1% parable and they use that to say the 99% does not mean what it says either.

Again, its Satan first lie and deception repeating itself for 6000 years.

Eric, everyone knows there's no such thing as the devil, satan, beelzebub, lucifer, the king of liars, ol' smoke, el diablo, Democrats (lol) they're all fabrics of our imagination. Shame on you for bringing those beliefs here. Tsk.

(09-03-2023 04:10 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  Eric, everyone knows there's no such thing as the devil, satan, beelzebub, lucifer, the king of liars, ol' smoke, el diablo, Democrats (lol) they're all fabrics of our imagination. Shame on you for bringing those beliefs here. Tsk.

Isn't it interesting how they all say that but they also all love to say they have their "demons".

(09-03-2023 12:30 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  This is the left's mentality; they gain comfort in being lied to.

No, they enjoy lying to other people.

(09-03-2023 01:13 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  This sounds like something Peloser would be throwing out there. They don't know the Bible but they consider themselves experts. You know like those idiots who want to change Latinos to Latinx.

I tell you Satan is having a hell day with these lost souls. He's loving it.

Maxine Waters herself said that God is on their side when they were fighting against Trump.

Maxine Waters is a pos.

How was this attributed when published--book, chapter, verse?

Or was it just presented as something non-Biblical that was made up?

(09-03-2023 12:13 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

Quote:Christians have voiced their reactions to a fabricated Bible verse, reportedly produced by ChatGPT, which suggests Jesus’ acceptance of trans-identified individuals.

A Reddit user, known as Psychological_Dog527, admitted to feeling despondent when they prompted ChatGPT to generate this “fake biblical passage” about “Jesus accepting trans people.” Psychological_Dog527 then shared this on the “r/trans” subreddit. “I know it’s not real, but it gave me some comfort,” the user conveyed.

“And a woman, whose heart was divided between spirit and body, came before him,” the fabricated passage reads. “In quiet despair, she asked, ‘Lord, I come to you estranged, for my spirit and body are not one. How shall I hope to enter the kingdom of God?'”

“Jesus looked upon her with kindness, replying, ‘my child, blessed are those who strive for unity within themselves, for they shall know the deepest truths of my Father’s creation,'” the passage continued. “Be not afraid, for in the kingdom of God, there is no man nor woman, as all are one in spirit. The gates of my Father’s kingdom will open for those who love and are loved, for God looks not upon the body, but the heart.”

The Advocate, a pro-LGBT outlet, highlighted this “trans-affirming” “Bible verse” on August 16. They portrayed the passage as a beacon of tolerance for LGBTQ+ individuals who often feel alienated from religious communities due to a history of exclusion. The outlet further noted that while many on Reddit appreciated the AI-generated verse, several users felt that the essence of biblical stories might be “likely lost in translation.” The article emphasized the distinction between religious texts that subtly recognize gender-nonconforming individuals and those that overtly acknowledge multiple genders beyond the binary.

However, Christian scholars and pundits have voiced concerns about OpenAI’s generation of platitudinous pablum in which the son of man appears to endorse genital mutilation. Messianic Jewish author and radio host Michael Brown penned an op-ed in The Christian Post, providing his interpretation of Jesus’ teachings on gender and sexuality in contrast to the machine-generated excerpt.

“There is truth to the claim that in God’s kingdom there is neither male nor female … this doesn’t mean that gender distinctions should be blurred or transgressed,” Brown said. He asserted that Jesus would approach a trans-identifying individual with compassion, urging “followers of Jesus” to emulate this behavior. However, he meticulously dissected the claims presented in the AI-generated verse. Brown referenced Paul’s teachings in Galatians 3:28 and Colossians 3:11, emphasizing the absence of caste or class in God’s kingdom. “We are all equal in Jesus,” Brown declared.

He further argued that this equality doesn’t negate the reality of gender distinctions. Brown emphasized that the Bible, including the New Testament, differentiates between genders, offering specific guidance to husbands and wives and recognizing only two sexes. Brown firmly believed that Jesus would not have performed drastic physical alterations on someone grappling with Body Integrity Identity Disorder or transformed a “furry” into their animal counterpart. He contended that Jesus would not tell a woman, who felt she was a man, to “Be made whole,” and then surgically alter her. Instead, Brown believes Jesus would help her find peace with her natural body.

Brown concluded with a thought-provoking statement, challenging the notion that Jesus would perform miracles that align with contemporary identity disorders. He posited that Jesus would heal from within, rather than catering to external identities.

Link

I always wondered about that. Chat GPT gets its info from scraping the web. Well---there is a ton of incorrect stuff on the web----so I was kinda wondering how AI would keep that incorrect internet content from being integrated into the knowledge base of the chat GPT algorithms. It would appear not only is that possible---but it appears that Chat GPT can literally start adding its own incorrect crap to the internet.

(09-03-2023 04:31 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  I always wondered about that. Chat GPT gets its info from scraping the web. Well---there is a ton of incorrect stuff on the web----so I was kinda wondering how AI would keep that incorrect internet content from being integrated into the knowledge base of the chat GPT algorithms. It would appear not only is that possible---but it appears that Chat GPT can literally start adding its own incorrect crap to the internet.

ChatGPT was prompted to create a fake verse that met a certain criteria. It just learned the style of Jesus's sayings, probably picked up the widely circulated story of the woman at the well, and did as it was told.

The real test will be to see if years from now ChatGPT can discern that the output that the user posted is indeed not actually from the Bible. People using it to make fake news stories, songs, art, etc. has proven to be quite popular.

(09-03-2023 06:08 PM)chargeradio Wrote:  

(09-03-2023 04:31 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  I always wondered about that. Chat GPT gets its info from scraping the web. Well---there is a ton of incorrect stuff on the web----so I was kinda wondering how AI would keep that incorrect internet content from being integrated into the knowledge base of the chat GPT algorithms. It would appear not only is that possible---but it appears that Chat GPT can literally start adding its own incorrect crap to the internet.

ChatGPT was prompted to create a fake verse that met a certain criteria. It just learned the style of Jesus's sayings, probably picked up the widely circulated story of the woman at the well, and did as it was told.

The real test will be to see if years from now ChatGPT can discern that the output that the user posted is indeed not actually from the Bible. People using it to make fake news stories, songs, art, etc. has proven to be quite popular.

And then will decide to add a "fake news" tag to it's posting which will be the next thing people have to complain about

Someone needs to get ChatGPT to write one condemning transgenderism as a tit-for-tat lol.

Wonder if they will use Chat GPT to make up verses for woke crap in the Koran. No?