The people that scream TOLERANCE, INCLUSION, & DIVERSITY are only interested in those concepts for people they agree with.

Liars and Phonies. All of them

I was in Tampa recently to catch a NHL game...nice town. Clean. Never felt like I had to keep track of who was around me on the streets. They are doing something right.

Memphis? lol. Pack your situational awareness and conceal carry. Used to be one of my favorite towns for a weekend get away but I doubt I'll ever go back. It's a mess now.

(03-22-2024 12:00 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  I was in Tampa recently to catch a NHL game...nice town. Clean. Never felt like I had to keep track of who was around me on the streets. They are doing something right.

Memphis? lol. Pack your situational awareness and conceal carry. Used to be one of my favorite towns for a weekend get away but I doubt I'll ever go back. It's a mess now.

I stay out of the city. Live and work in the suburbs. It’ll always be “home” but it has turned into a complete dump. Sad to see

(03-22-2024 10:50 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 06:56 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(03-21-2024 04:20 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-21-2024 12:15 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(03-20-2024 11:52 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  If you think he had a right to be at a protest with a rifle then you obviously also think they have a right to protest him.

If I’m not mistaken he was assisting with private security hired by a property owner at or near the sight of a liberal protest.

He was armed and an assault was attempted on his person by several liberal protesters, chasing him, hitting him in the head, after being knocked down, with a skateboard, as well as having a weapon pointed at him, among other acts of violence.

He fired his weapon, clearly in self defense, as was ruled in court.

Safe to say that if the leftwing protesters didn’t attempt to assault him, they wouldn’t have been shot.

End of story.

Liberal hypocrites hate free speech when it opposes their views. It’s why they’re hypocrites.

The car dealership testified at his trial that they didn’t invite him or his friends to provide security.

The best description of what he was doing is counter protesting.

Open carry is idiotic and a tool of either political intimidation or attention seeking behavior. If you actually want to defend yourself concealed carry is a much better option.

Obviously not in this case as the one that carried concealed got shot when he brought out his weapon and pointed it at Rittenhouse.

All of Kyle’s problems started because of open carry. The first guy he shot was mad because earlier in the day he thought Kyle pointed his rifle at him then he put out a dumpster on fire. He chased him down and tried to take his rifle and Kyle shot him, which was eventually ruled self defense.

“If I would have let Mr. Rosenbaum take my firearm from me, he would have used it and killed me with it and probably killed more people if I would have let him get my gun,” Rittenhouse testified.

This is an example of how open carrying a firearm immediately jumps up the force continuum to lethal force. You have introduced a deadly weapon into every confrontation from the beginning, vs still having options if concealed.

Kyle’s entire justification for shooting him depends on things that wouldn’t be a factor if he was carrying concealed. Someone carrying concealed have still defended themselves if they needed to, but wouldn’t be putting the giant target on their back that open carrying an AR15 does.

The second two shootings happened because he was running away from the site of a shooting with a rifle. “He just shot someone” people in the crowd yelled. If he had holstered a pistol after the first shooting he is in a much better position to slide away without another shooting than running away from the site of a shooting with an AR.

He was 17, out after the 8pm curfew, and carrying a rifle after saying 15 days before that he wanted to shoot someone. He put himself in the position to get his wish.

“Bro I wish I had my (expletive) AR. l’d start shooting rounds at them.”

There were many other people who weren't armed who were attacked during the riots. Democrat politicians did everything they could to enable these knotheads into thinking anything they did would be okay. They attacked police, they attacked civilians, they burned down building, and destroyed all kinds of private property. He had as much right to be there as those rioting and the court ruled he acted in self defense. Those idiot chanting "no justice no peace" are fools just like every other imbecile who thinks justice wasn't done because the court didn't rule the way they wished.
The morons who attacked a person carrying a rifle put themselves in a position to get shot. And they deserved what they got.
And who among us hasn't made a comment like the last sentence. If Rittenhouse wanted to kill people he could have offed many more than he did. There certainly were plenty more asking for it. If anything he showed tremendous restraint and superb fire control.

I had a shotgun in my car when i went to tiger high. Complete non issue. These freaks want control. Period They are low iq fascists. Frick em.

(03-22-2024 03:42 PM)shere khan Wrote:  I had a shotgun in my car when i went to tiger high. Complete non issue. These freaks want control. Period They are low iq fascists. Frick em.

That's a little bit of overkill. I carried a Louisville Slugger with a rail spike through the fat of the bat. Had 3 punks with chains and knives who didn't like who I was dating and when I got out of the car with the bat, they looked at it and told me it was their verbal warning and scattered. But then when I came along not every punk had a gun. Back then the Alley Oop look apparently spooked them!

(03-22-2024 04:43 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 03:42 PM)shere khan Wrote:  I had a shotgun in my car when i went to tiger high. Complete non issue. These freaks want control. Period They are low iq fascists. Frick em.

That's a little bit of overkill. I carried a Louisville Slugger with a rail spike through the fat of the bat. Had 3 punks with chains and knives who didn't like who I was dating and when I got out of the car with the bat, they looked at it and told me it was their verbal warning and scattered. But then when I came along not every punk had a gun. Back then the Alley Oop look apparently spooked them!

why?

b/c it was more fonzies if req'd...

#Adirondack #mediEval

(03-22-2024 05:00 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 04:43 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 03:42 PM)shere khan Wrote:  I had a shotgun in my car when i went to tiger high. Complete non issue. These freaks want control. Period They are low iq fascists. Frick em.

That's a little bit of overkill. I carried a Louisville Slugger with a rail spike through the fat of the bat. Had 3 punks with chains and knives who didn't like who I was dating and when I got out of the car with the bat, they looked at it and told me it was their verbal warning and scattered. But then when I came along not every punk had a gun. Back then the Alley Oop look apparently spooked them!

why?

b/c it was more fonzies if req'd...

#Adirondack #mediEval

Why? Yes more fonzies. Or as Joachim Phoenix said in "Signs", it just didn't feel right not to swing!

(03-22-2024 05:10 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 05:00 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 04:43 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 03:42 PM)shere khan Wrote:  I had a shotgun in my car when i went to tiger high. Complete non issue. These freaks want control. Period They are low iq fascists. Frick em.

That's a little bit of overkill. I carried a Louisville Slugger with a rail spike through the fat of the bat. Had 3 punks with chains and knives who didn't like who I was dating and when I got out of the car with the bat, they looked at it and told me it was their verbal warning and scattered. But then when I came along not every punk had a gun. Back then the Alley Oop look apparently spooked them!

why?

b/c it was more fonzies if req'd...

#Adirondack #mediEval

Why? Yes more fonzies. Or as Joachim Phoenix said in "Signs", it just didn't feel right not to swing!

IIRC, we've previously dis'cuss'ed this ... nice arcane ref, btw!

(03-22-2024 10:50 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 06:56 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(03-21-2024 04:20 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-21-2024 12:15 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(03-20-2024 11:52 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  If you think he had a right to be at a protest with a rifle then you obviously also think they have a right to protest him.

If I’m not mistaken he was assisting with private security hired by a property owner at or near the sight of a liberal protest.

He was armed and an assault was attempted on his person by several liberal protesters, chasing him, hitting him in the head, after being knocked down, with a skateboard, as well as having a weapon pointed at him, among other acts of violence.

He fired his weapon, clearly in self defense, as was ruled in court.

Safe to say that if the leftwing protesters didn’t attempt to assault him, they wouldn’t have been shot.

End of story.

Liberal hypocrites hate free speech when it opposes their views. It’s why they’re hypocrites.

The car dealership testified at his trial that they didn’t invite him or his friends to provide security.

The best description of what he was doing is counter protesting.

Open carry is idiotic and a tool of either political intimidation or attention seeking behavior. If you actually want to defend yourself concealed carry is a much better option.

Obviously not in this case as the one that carried concealed got shot when he brought out his weapon and pointed it at Rittenhouse.

All of Kyle’s problems started because of open carry. The first guy he shot was mad because earlier in the day he thought Kyle pointed his rifle at him then he put out a dumpster on fire. He chased him down and tried to take his rifle and Kyle shot him, which was eventually ruled self defense.

“If I would have let Mr. Rosenbaum take my firearm from me, he would have used it and killed me with it and probably killed more people if I would have let him get my gun,” Rittenhouse testified.

This is an example of how open carrying a firearm immediately jumps up the force continuum to lethal force. You have introduced a deadly weapon into every confrontation from the beginning, vs still having options if concealed.

Kyle’s entire justification for shooting him depends on things that wouldn’t be a factor if he was carrying concealed. Someone carrying concealed have still defended themselves if they needed to, but wouldn’t be putting the giant target on their back that open carrying an AR15 does.

The second two shootings happened because he was running away from the site of a shooting with a rifle. “He just shot someone” people in the crowd yelled. If he had holstered a pistol after the first shooting he is in a much better position to slide away without another shooting than running away from the site of a shooting with an AR.

He was 17, out after the 8pm curfew, and carrying a rifle after saying 15 days before that he wanted to shoot someone. He put himself in the position to get his wish.

“Bro I wish I had my (expletive) AR. l’d start shooting rounds at them.”

Cite your sources or admit that's a lie. I followed his case very closely and that's the 1st time I ever heard that.

(03-22-2024 10:52 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 08:49 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 12:55 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-21-2024 08:59 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(03-21-2024 04:20 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Open carry is idiotic and a tool of either political intimidation or attention seeking behavior. If you actually want to defend yourself concealed carry is a much better option.

So cops are idiots? Once again you embarrass yourself.

Cops mostly have a L3 retention holster and all have training on weapon retention, and many times their presence is there for a deterrent.

Not that I open carry, we don't disagree about the downside of that, however, I have that same training, as do lots of people with a carry permit. Your point there is lame.

(03-22-2024 12:55 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Civilian self defense is a last resort.

Bullchit. Civilian self defense is the FIRST resort. Cops investigate crimes, they don't prevent them, and a gun in the hand is worth 100 cops on the phone. What planet do you live on?

I actually agree with most of the rest of your comments.

First option is to not put yourself in a situation where you will need it. Situational awareness is one of the most powerful weapons. Second option is getting out of dodge. Last option should be killing someone on the street.

Your first duty is to protect yourself by any means necessary. Of course killing someone is a last resort.

Have you ever even been in a situation where you've had to draw your weapon to defend yourself? I doubt it. I have, 3 times. It's a very effective deterrent.

(03-22-2024 11:24 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 10:52 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  First option is to not put yourself in a situation where you will need it. Situational awareness is one of the most powerful weapons. Second option is getting out of dodge. Last option should be killing someone on the street.

Yet another idiotic comment.

You can't go to a big city (Memphis is the one we're discussing at the moment) without putting yourself in that situation. Personally, I removed myself from all that and only go there if it's absolutely unavoidable. Not everyone has that option. Situational awareness is indeed your first line of defense, but it guarantees nothing, and getting the fk out of Dodge is easy enough to say, not usually so easy to do on the street. I'm too old to outrun much of anyone these days and won't try to.

Hesitate and die. I won't cry for you when that happens.

Natural selection is a real thing.

(03-22-2024 12:49 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 12:00 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  I was in Tampa recently to catch a NHL game...nice town. Clean. Never felt like I had to keep track of who was around me on the streets. They are doing something right.

Memphis? lol. Pack your situational awareness and conceal carry. Used to be one of my favorite towns for a weekend get away but I doubt I'll ever go back. It's a mess now.

I stay out of the city. Live and work in the suburbs. It’ll always be “home” but it has turned into a complete dump. Sad to see

That's me. It will always be the landing spot I call home but I can't live there anymore.

(03-22-2024 07:24 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 12:49 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 12:00 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  I was in Tampa recently to catch a NHL game...nice town. Clean. Never felt like I had to keep track of who was around me on the streets. They are doing something right.

Memphis? lol. Pack your situational awareness and conceal carry. Used to be one of my favorite towns for a weekend get away but I doubt I'll ever go back. It's a mess now.

I stay out of the city. Live and work in the suburbs. It’ll always be “home” but it has turned into a complete dump. Sad to see

That's me. It will always be the landing spot I call home but I can't live there anymore.

Which is one reason conferences like the Big 12 and ACC overlook the Tigers. If they want their university to advance the city has to clean it up.

(03-22-2024 07:18 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 10:50 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 06:56 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(03-21-2024 04:20 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-21-2024 12:15 AM)450bench Wrote:  If I’m not mistaken he was assisting with private security hired by a property owner at or near the sight of a liberal protest.

He was armed and an assault was attempted on his person by several liberal protesters, chasing him, hitting him in the head, after being knocked down, with a skateboard, as well as having a weapon pointed at him, among other acts of violence.

He fired his weapon, clearly in self defense, as was ruled in court.

Safe to say that if the leftwing protesters didn’t attempt to assault him, they wouldn’t have been shot.

End of story.

Liberal hypocrites hate free speech when it opposes their views. It’s why they’re hypocrites.

The car dealership testified at his trial that they didn’t invite him or his friends to provide security.

The best description of what he was doing is counter protesting.

Open carry is idiotic and a tool of either political intimidation or attention seeking behavior. If you actually want to defend yourself concealed carry is a much better option.

Obviously not in this case as the one that carried concealed got shot when he brought out his weapon and pointed it at Rittenhouse.

All of Kyle’s problems started because of open carry. The first guy he shot was mad because earlier in the day he thought Kyle pointed his rifle at him then he put out a dumpster on fire. He chased him down and tried to take his rifle and Kyle shot him, which was eventually ruled self defense.

“If I would have let Mr. Rosenbaum take my firearm from me, he would have used it and killed me with it and probably killed more people if I would have let him get my gun,” Rittenhouse testified.

This is an example of how open carrying a firearm immediately jumps up the force continuum to lethal force. You have introduced a deadly weapon into every confrontation from the beginning, vs still having options if concealed.

Kyle’s entire justification for shooting him depends on things that wouldn’t be a factor if he was carrying concealed. Someone carrying concealed have still defended themselves if they needed to, but wouldn’t be putting the giant target on their back that open carrying an AR15 does.

The second two shootings happened because he was running away from the site of a shooting with a rifle. “He just shot someone” people in the crowd yelled. If he had holstered a pistol after the first shooting he is in a much better position to slide away without another shooting than running away from the site of a shooting with an AR.

He was 17, out after the 8pm curfew, and carrying a rifle after saying 15 days before that he wanted to shoot someone. He put himself in the position to get his wish.

“Bro I wish I had my (expletive) AR. l’d start shooting rounds at them.”

Cite your sources or admit that's a lie. I followed his case very closely and that's the 1st time I ever heard that.

If you followed the trial that closely you should remember that the prosecution wanted to show the jury the video of Kyle saying that but the judge wouldn’t let them.

https://apnews.com/article/trials-f19acb...78105db1ce

(03-23-2024 12:04 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 07:18 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 10:50 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 06:56 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(03-21-2024 04:20 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  The car dealership testified at his trial that they didn’t invite him or his friends to provide security.

The best description of what he was doing is counter protesting.

Open carry is idiotic and a tool of either political intimidation or attention seeking behavior. If you actually want to defend yourself concealed carry is a much better option.

Obviously not in this case as the one that carried concealed got shot when he brought out his weapon and pointed it at Rittenhouse.

All of Kyle’s problems started because of open carry. The first guy he shot was mad because earlier in the day he thought Kyle pointed his rifle at him then he put out a dumpster on fire. He chased him down and tried to take his rifle and Kyle shot him, which was eventually ruled self defense.

“If I would have let Mr. Rosenbaum take my firearm from me, he would have used it and killed me with it and probably killed more people if I would have let him get my gun,” Rittenhouse testified.

This is an example of how open carrying a firearm immediately jumps up the force continuum to lethal force. You have introduced a deadly weapon into every confrontation from the beginning, vs still having options if concealed.

Kyle’s entire justification for shooting him depends on things that wouldn’t be a factor if he was carrying concealed. Someone carrying concealed have still defended themselves if they needed to, but wouldn’t be putting the giant target on their back that open carrying an AR15 does.

The second two shootings happened because he was running away from the site of a shooting with a rifle. “He just shot someone” people in the crowd yelled. If he had holstered a pistol after the first shooting he is in a much better position to slide away without another shooting than running away from the site of a shooting with an AR.

He was 17, out after the 8pm curfew, and carrying a rifle after saying 15 days before that he wanted to shoot someone. He put himself in the position to get his wish.

“Bro I wish I had my (expletive) AR. l’d start shooting rounds at them.”

Cite your sources or admit that's a lie. I followed his case very closely and that's the 1st time I ever heard that.

If you followed the trial that closely you should remember that the prosecution wanted to show the jury the video of Kyle saying that but the judge wouldn’t let them.

https://apnews.com/article/trials-f19acb...78105db1ce

click on linky ... it's a mask festival w/o a g'dammed vid....

post the vid or stfu!

(03-23-2024 12:08 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(03-23-2024 12:04 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 07:18 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 10:50 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 06:56 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  Obviously not in this case as the one that carried concealed got shot when he brought out his weapon and pointed it at Rittenhouse.

All of Kyle’s problems started because of open carry. The first guy he shot was mad because earlier in the day he thought Kyle pointed his rifle at him then he put out a dumpster on fire. He chased him down and tried to take his rifle and Kyle shot him, which was eventually ruled self defense.

“If I would have let Mr. Rosenbaum take my firearm from me, he would have used it and killed me with it and probably killed more people if I would have let him get my gun,” Rittenhouse testified.

This is an example of how open carrying a firearm immediately jumps up the force continuum to lethal force. You have introduced a deadly weapon into every confrontation from the beginning, vs still having options if concealed.

Kyle’s entire justification for shooting him depends on things that wouldn’t be a factor if he was carrying concealed. Someone carrying concealed have still defended themselves if they needed to, but wouldn’t be putting the giant target on their back that open carrying an AR15 does.

The second two shootings happened because he was running away from the site of a shooting with a rifle. “He just shot someone” people in the crowd yelled. If he had holstered a pistol after the first shooting he is in a much better position to slide away without another shooting than running away from the site of a shooting with an AR.

He was 17, out after the 8pm curfew, and carrying a rifle after saying 15 days before that he wanted to shoot someone. He put himself in the position to get his wish.

“Bro I wish I had my (expletive) AR. l’d start shooting rounds at them.”

Cite your sources or admit that's a lie. I followed his case very closely and that's the 1st time I ever heard that.

If you followed the trial that closely you should remember that the prosecution wanted to show the jury the video of Kyle saying that but the judge wouldn’t let them.

https://apnews.com/article/trials-f19acb...78105db1ce

click on linky ... it's a mask festival w/o a g'dammed vid....

post the vid or stfu!

There is this magic box on the internet called Google. Most people can type stuff in there and it finds it.

(03-23-2024 12:26 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-23-2024 12:08 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(03-23-2024 12:04 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 07:18 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 10:50 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  All of Kyle’s problems started because of open carry. The first guy he shot was mad because earlier in the day he thought Kyle pointed his rifle at him then he put out a dumpster on fire. He chased him down and tried to take his rifle and Kyle shot him, which was eventually ruled self defense.

“If I would have let Mr. Rosenbaum take my firearm from me, he would have used it and killed me with it and probably killed more people if I would have let him get my gun,” Rittenhouse testified.

This is an example of how open carrying a firearm immediately jumps up the force continuum to lethal force. You have introduced a deadly weapon into every confrontation from the beginning, vs still having options if concealed.

Kyle’s entire justification for shooting him depends on things that wouldn’t be a factor if he was carrying concealed. Someone carrying concealed have still defended themselves if they needed to, but wouldn’t be putting the giant target on their back that open carrying an AR15 does.

The second two shootings happened because he was running away from the site of a shooting with a rifle. “He just shot someone” people in the crowd yelled. If he had holstered a pistol after the first shooting he is in a much better position to slide away without another shooting than running away from the site of a shooting with an AR.

He was 17, out after the 8pm curfew, and carrying a rifle after saying 15 days before that he wanted to shoot someone. He put himself in the position to get his wish.

“Bro I wish I had my (expletive) AR. l’d start shooting rounds at them.”

Cite your sources or admit that's a lie. I followed his case very closely and that's the 1st time I ever heard that.

If you followed the trial that closely you should remember that the prosecution wanted to show the jury the video of Kyle saying that but the judge wouldn’t let them.

https://apnews.com/article/trials-f19acb...78105db1ce

click on linky ... it's a mask festival w/o a g'dammed vid....

post the vid or stfu!

There is this magic box on the internet called Google. Most people can type stuff in there and it finds it.

fu and google too ... you have a responsibility to back up your claim .... neither the linky, nor it's linkys did such...

therefore, fockall unless you can produce the fk'n vid....

it's why ewes are nothing but the appetizer...

(03-23-2024 12:30 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(03-23-2024 12:26 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-23-2024 12:08 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(03-23-2024 12:04 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-22-2024 07:18 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Cite your sources or admit that's a lie. I followed his case very closely and that's the 1st time I ever heard that.

If you followed the trial that closely you should remember that the prosecution wanted to show the jury the video of Kyle saying that but the judge wouldn’t let them.

https://apnews.com/article/trials-f19acb...78105db1ce

click on linky ... it's a mask festival w/o a g'dammed vid....

post the vid or stfu!

There is this magic box on the internet called Google. Most people can type stuff in there and it finds it.

fu and google too ... you have a responsibility to back up your claim .... neither the linky, nor it's linkys did such...

therefore, fockall unless you can produce the fk'n vid....

it's why ewes are nothing but the appetizer...

If you need help with Google because of your spelling all you have to do is ask.

The article was about the prosecution trying to admit the video, which is what I wanted to show.

(03-23-2024 12:37 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-23-2024 12:30 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(03-23-2024 12:26 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-23-2024 12:08 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(03-23-2024 12:04 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  If you followed the trial that closely you should remember that the prosecution wanted to show the jury the video of Kyle saying that but the judge wouldn’t let them.

https://apnews.com/article/trials-f19acb...78105db1ce

click on linky ... it's a mask festival w/o a g'dammed vid....

post the vid or stfu!

There is this magic box on the internet called Google. Most people can type stuff in there and it finds it.

fu and google too ... you have a responsibility to back up your claim .... neither the linky, nor it's linkys did such...

therefore, fockall unless you can produce the fk'n vid....

it's why ewes are nothing but the appetizer...

If you need help with Google because of your spelling all you have to do is ask.

The article was about the prosecution trying to admit the video, which is