(01-17-2018 12:29 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(01-17-2018 12:26 PM)otown Wrote:  

(01-17-2018 12:22 PM)BullsFanInTX Wrote:  This CFP committee is biased and inherently unfair. I just don't get how people can't see that. What am I missing? And, Aresco is for this committee as constituted?

Who does the selection for candidates? Who were the candidates? How were they selected? Who was nominated? How did the selection progress go? Did the conferences plus ND vote on them? Were the votes party line 6-5?

So many questions, so little answers.................all in the dark.

All you need to know is each conference gets a vote. Thats 5-5...then Notre Dame gets a vote.

So the voting becomes P5-6 G5-5. The 13 member committee is virtually all P5 reps with a G5 lap dog or two for window dressing. Its a joke. Thats why I was completely against the Selection Committee concept from the start. Its much easier to rig than 2 polls comprised of thousands of voters working in conjunction with multiple computer models. Cant easily control an outcome with that many inputs. Here, they get 13 guys in a smokey room. Better yet---they get to pick the 13 guys. Now, it they can just buy off the refs in a few key games we can have Alabama vs LSU for the Natty every year.

Which is why I keep saying the DOJ needs to bring up ESPN, the SEC, and the CFP committee on RICO charges for running an unlawful monopoly.