tigerjeb Wrote:has it ever occured to you that all you have heard is bossman's side of things?
is it possible that all these plans and deals he's come up with have not come to pass for perfectly good reasons? can you not concede that the university has to protect its positions and is a state run entity that has procedure, policys and rules it has to follow that just may not jibe with what bossman dreams up?
do you honestly think that u of m AND usm would be a part of a "copywrighted black and blue bowl" that they did not own the "copywright" to? you cant just walk up to universities and wave your hands and stomp your feet and have all the little magical things you dream up come true. but you can come on a message board, spin your story, puff up your chest, and get folks all charged up for something that hasnt got a chance in hell of happening, because you are not working through the university, you are working for yourself.
Again, you misunderstand my position. I don't have a beef with the university not just signing off on some trophy idea. I didn't even address that part of the post.
I'm talking about someone coming on here and saying: "Your name isn't on the ledger so you don't donate" and citing our wonderful athletic adminstration as the infallible truth on that matter. The truth is that there are hundreds of people out there that donate in the thousands EACH YEAR and our administration doesn't even KNOW THEY EXIST, and it's all the result of their terribly flawed system for establishing donor levels & accumulating priority points.
I know of several people who donate thousands of dollars annually. They pool their contribution because it's the only way to get good seats in this twisted system. It doesn't matter if you want 2 tickets or 10, both have to donate the same amount. Why donate $10K by yourself to get 2 tickets when you could find 4 other people & split it and pay $2K each? You know this. Also, if someone donated for years, but decided to stop (or heaven forbid they died), their years of donating, accumulating points, etc. are GONE. What if you were part of a group of 5 people that pooled $2K each for 10 years, then one day the guy whose name it's in moves to Malaysia? What do you do? You keep donating in his name to retain your priority. This goes on all the time.
Now, I'm not saying this is BOSSMAN's situation, I'm just pointing out the perils of claiming that because you're not on the university "ledgers" that you don't donate money.
I agree 100% on the copyright stuff. I'm aware of & remember all the ideas that have come & gone (the Tiger statue thingy, etc.). I understand where BOSSMAN might have credibility issues based on that. I'm just playing the part of BOSSMAN's mt.org attorney and attacking the witness's credibility in this case. When the Tiger Clubs ledgers are your source, then your credibility is shaky at best. :laugh: