(01-03-2016 11:48 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Violent protesters injure innocent civilians, members of the media, police & fire personnel and do tens of millions of dollars of damage to public and private property in not one but two cities and the leftists decry law enforcement using armored vehicles and tear gas.


Protesters who haven't hurt a soul and done little if any damage to a remote, isolated building and they want them summarily executed.

Liberalism is indeed a mental disease.

well stated!

(01-03-2016 11:48 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Violent protesters injure innocent civilians, members of the media, police & fire personnel and do tens of millions of dollars of damage to public and private property in not one but two cities and the leftists decry law enforcement using armored vehicles and tear gas.


Protesters who haven't hurt a soul and done little if any damage to a remote, isolated building and they want them summarily executed.

Liberalism is indeed a mental disease.

http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northw...spark.html

(01-03-2016 05:22 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  They are domestic terrorists plain and simple. Should be executed.

It's always the "compassionate" left that is the most ruthlessly violent when the power of the state is challenged.

(01-03-2016 06:37 PM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(01-03-2016 10:49 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  We'll see if the Feds learned anything from Waco and Ruby Ridge. I suspect they have not. If that is the case, they'll of course send in some advanced military equipment probably operated by current or former military personnel -- in gross violation of posse comitatus -- and wipe them out. And in doing so they'll just raise the heat on the low simmer of dissidents. They'll kill Bundy, sure. But they'll create 3 more of him.

Are you threatening terrorist attacks?

I'm merely remarking upon historical trends. This government still thinks droning 10 innocent civilians to get one terrorist is acceptable, completely ignoring the fact that they're apt to create 10 or more terrorists in the process. Why would they be any less braindead domestically?

(01-03-2016 10:43 PM)BlazerFan11 Wrote:  If you applied this definition universally, do you know who would far and away be the largest terrorist organization in the world?

The U.S. government.

Accurate. And I suspect we won't be hearing a rebuttal on this from the "execute them" compassionate liberals here.

(01-03-2016 05:42 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Doesn't appear to fit the definition to me.

And only one side can point weapons? The other must obey and be willing servants? This is kind of what that little 'ol 2nd is all about.

Yes. We've been over this. Only one side can point weapons or you die.

(01-04-2016 12:03 AM)pharaoh0 Wrote:  

(01-03-2016 11:48 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Violent protesters injure innocent civilians, members of the media, police & fire personnel and do tens of millions of dollars of damage to public and private property in not one but two cities and the leftists decry law enforcement using armored vehicles and tear gas.


Protesters who haven't hurt a soul and done little if any damage to a remote, isolated building and they want them summarily executed.

Liberalism is indeed a mental disease.

well stated!

The Clintons and Waco come to mind !

(01-04-2016 03:27 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(01-03-2016 05:42 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Doesn't appear to fit the definition to me.

And only one side can point weapons? The other must obey and be willing servants? This is kind of what that little 'ol 2nd is all about.

Yes. We've been over this. Only one side can point weapons or you die.

If some 25 year old fresh out of the academy shoots you for scratching your ass, oh well. You WILL respect the authority of the police.

If these so-far-right-they-are-off-the-map nut jobs break federal law, suddenly we have to question government authority and overreach and spit out some nonsense about the federal government not being allowed to own property (still trying to figure that one out).

Typical.

Why isn't the Dad in jail? He owes more than a million dollars in grazing fees? This stunt the kids pulled should land them in jail too.

Imagine if some Indians had tried to take back their land.

(01-04-2016 06:51 AM)HappyAppy Wrote:  

(01-04-2016 03:27 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(01-03-2016 05:42 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Doesn't appear to fit the definition to me.

And only one side can point weapons? The other must obey and be willing servants? This is kind of what that little 'ol 2nd is all about.

Yes. We've been over this. Only one side can point weapons or you die.

If some 25 year old fresh out of the academy shoots you for scratching your ass, oh well. You WILL respect the authority of the police.

If these so-far-right-they-are-off-the-map nut jobs break federal law, suddenly we have to question government authority and overreach and spit out some nonsense about the federal government not being allowed to own property (still trying to figure that one out).

Typical.

For a 2nd stringer, I'm impressed by your posts. You have a future in the SR.

(01-04-2016 06:51 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Why isn't the Dad in jail? He owes more than a million dollars in grazing fees?

So we should reinstitute debtors' prisons?

You ever wonder how many times the Government has trampled on peoples rights and have taken away land and property from Them in the name of Progress ? The government is Not your friend, just a Giant Corporation.

#y'allqaida

#vanillaisis

(01-03-2016 05:22 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  They are domestic terrorists plain and simple. Should be executed.

Even the town people want them out.

(01-04-2016 08:41 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-04-2016 06:51 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Why isn't the Dad in jail? He owes more than a million dollars in grazing fees?

So we should reinstitute debtors' prisons?

In the mind of progressives debtors' prisons are find for government debt.

(01-04-2016 06:51 AM)HappyAppy Wrote:  

(01-04-2016 03:27 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(01-03-2016 05:42 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Doesn't appear to fit the definition to me.

And only one side can point weapons? The other must obey and be willing servants? This is kind of what that little 'ol 2nd is all about.

Yes. We've been over this. Only one side can point weapons or you die.

If some 25 year old fresh out of the academy shoots you for scratching your ass, oh well. You WILL respect the authority of the police.

If these so-far-right-they-are-off-the-map nut jobs break federal law, suddenly we have to question government authority and overreach and spit out some nonsense about the federal government not being allowed to own property (still trying to figure that one out).

Typical.

You're going ot make me openly side with GTS on something... That takes black belt level fail on your part.

If the 25 year old has a reasonable reason to fear for his life or the life of a civilian then he can defend himself or the public. These people occupying the property, though I disagree with their methods, are not endangering anyone at all.

and GTS, by the way, questions the police all the time. The fact he does not universally believe a "hands up dont shoot" story before their is proof, or that he does not think police are instantly guilty all the time does not make him a state apologist.

(01-04-2016 06:51 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Why isn't the Dad in jail? He owes more than a million dollars in grazing fees? This stunt the kids pulled should land them in jail too.

Yeah, we need debtors prison.

(01-04-2016 06:51 AM)HappyAppy Wrote:  

(01-04-2016 03:27 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(01-03-2016 05:42 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Doesn't appear to fit the definition to me.

And only one side can point weapons? The other must obey and be willing servants? This is kind of what that little 'ol 2nd is all about.

Yes. We've been over this. Only one side can point weapons or you die.

If some 25 year old fresh out of the academy shoots you for scratching your ass, oh well. You WILL respect the authority of the police.

If these so-far-right-they-are-off-the-map nut jobs break federal law, suddenly we have to question government authority and overreach and spit out some nonsense about the federal government not being allowed to own property (still trying to figure that one out).

Typical.

Now I'm trying to figure something out. Where did I say feds are not allowed to own property?

That's the problem with you idiot dumbasses, you argue against **** you yourselves make up. Moron.

(01-04-2016 01:01 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(01-03-2016 05:22 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  They are domestic terrorists plain and simple. Should be executed.

It's always the "compassionate" left that is the most ruthlessly violent when the power of the state is challenged.