(11-16-2017 12:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:43 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:31 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 11:36 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Menendez is OT to the discussion. But just curious, I'm aware of the corruption charges. Are you saying that there are pedophilia charges against him? Can you please provide a source?

It's not off topic, and you aren't the police of what can and can't be brought up in a thread so stop acting like the CSNBBS SS. Do your own research.

It's most certainly off topic if Menendez is not accused of any inappropriate sexual activity. And even if he was (which IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to support since you interjected it) this thread is about Moore.

#whataboutism

Let me hold you guys hands. I know google is tough to use.

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news...story.html

Quote: Federal prosecutors said Monday that they aren’t convinced claims U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez cavorted with underage hookers – widely seen as discredited – are false...


Prosecutors said the hooker allegations against Sen. Bob Menendez 'were not so easily disprovable as the defendants suggest.'

Are accusations not equivalent to certainties when levied against democrats as they are with republicans? If anyone here can't admit there is a double standard, they're full of .

Case in point the 13 pages filled with excuses for Frankken in the other thread.

It's not hand holding dumb ass. It's appropriate behavior around or here...or at least it should be. If you don't provide the source you're referring to, we can't debate it because we don't know how credible it is. Get it? It's not my job to traipse around google in hopes of finding what on earth you're talking about.

So because of your dickish behavior we all have wasted time and energy yelling at each other when it could have easily avoided.

You're the only one with your panties in a bunch. My original post of "Bob Menendez" was largely a rhetorical statement calling out obvious bias.

Quite astonishing that someone that has taken part in discussions that evolved into Menendez and possible prostitutes on this very board wouldn't be aware of the matter.

(11-16-2017 12:53 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:43 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:31 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  It's not off topic, and you aren't the police of what can and can't be brought up in a thread so stop acting like the CSNBBS SS. Do your own research.

It's most certainly off topic if Menendez is not accused of any inappropriate sexual activity. And even if he was (which IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to support since you interjected it) this thread is about Moore.

#whataboutism

Let me hold you guys hands. I know google is tough to use.

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news...story.html

Quote: Federal prosecutors said Monday that they aren’t convinced claims U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez cavorted with underage hookers – widely seen as discredited – are false...


Prosecutors said the hooker allegations against Sen. Bob Menendez 'were not so easily disprovable as the defendants suggest.'

Are accusations not equivalent to certainties when levied against democrats as they are with republicans? If anyone here can't admit there is a double standard, they're full of .

Case in point the 13 pages filled with excuses for Frankken in the other thread.

It's not hand holding dumb ass. It's appropriate behavior around or here...or at least it should be. If you don't provide the source you're referring to, we can't debate it because we don't know how credible it is. Get it? It's not my job to traipse around google in hopes of finding what on earth you're talking about.

So because of your dickish behavior we all have wasted time and energy yelling at each other when it could have easily avoided.

You're the only one with your panties in a bunch. My original post of "Bob Menendez" was largely a rhetorical statement calling out obvious bias.

Quite astonishing that someone that has taken part in discussions that evolved into Menendez and possible prostitutes on this very board wouldn't be aware of the matter.

My Goodness there certainly is a lot of whataboutism going on here today. The thread topic is "Should Roy Moore Withdraw"?

I fail to see how Robert Menenedez, or Al Franken really have much relevance here. There are active threads on BOTH of them if you'd like to discuss that.

So Roy Moore is still defiant.

(11-16-2017 12:56 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:53 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:43 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It's most certainly off topic if Menendez is not accused of any inappropriate sexual activity. And even if he was (which IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to support since you interjected it) this thread is about Moore.

#whataboutism

Let me hold you guys hands. I know google is tough to use.

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news...story.html

Quote: Federal prosecutors said Monday that they aren’t convinced claims U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez cavorted with underage hookers – widely seen as discredited – are false...


Prosecutors said the hooker allegations against Sen. Bob Menendez 'were not so easily disprovable as the defendants suggest.'

Are accusations not equivalent to certainties when levied against democrats as they are with republicans? If anyone here can't admit there is a double standard, they're full of .

Case in point the 13 pages filled with excuses for Frankken in the other thread.

It's not hand holding dumb ass. It's appropriate behavior around or here...or at least it should be. If you don't provide the source you're referring to, we can't debate it because we don't know how credible it is. Get it? It's not my job to traipse around google in hopes of finding what on earth you're talking about.

So because of your dickish behavior we all have wasted time and energy yelling at each other when it could have easily avoided.

You're the only one with your panties in a bunch. My original post of "Bob Menendez" was largely a rhetorical statement calling out obvious bias.

Quite astonishing that someone that has taken part in discussions that evolved into Menendez and possible prostitutes on this very board wouldn't be aware of the matter.

My Goodness there certainly is a lot of whataboutism going on here today. The thread topic is "Should Roy Moore Withdraw"?

I fail to see how Robert Menenedez, or Al Franken really have much relevance here. There are active threads on BOTH of them if you'd like to discuss that.

So Roy Moore is still defiant.

Probably because he's the one that is most likely innocent.

(11-16-2017 12:52 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Shove your ******* talking points up your ass. Everything you and your minions post could be called a talking point, however WE DON'T SAY A WORD OR GIVE A ****, so knock it the **** off.

Stop parroting talking points and people will stop calling you on it... It's pretty simple actually.

I didn't parrot any ******* talking points asshat. I haven't read one thing other than the one story posted about Franken in the last hour. I'm at work reading this site while I eat lunch and listen to music on my phone.

So you're a damned ******* liar. Besides. WHO GIVES A ******* **** ANYWAY! Every damned post on this site could be called a talking point. So again, STFU with this nonsense.

(11-16-2017 01:06 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:52 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Shove your ******* talking points up your ass. Everything you and your minions post could be called a talking point, however WE DON'T SAY A WORD OR GIVE A ****, so knock it the **** off.

Stop parroting talking points and people will stop calling you on it... It's pretty simple actually.

I didn't parrot any ******* talking points asshat. I haven't read one thing other than the one story posted about Franken in the last hour. I'm at work reading this site while I eat lunch and listen to music on my phone.

So you're a damned ******* liar. Besides. WHO GIVES A ******* **** ANYWAY! Every damned post on this site could be called a talking point. So again, STFU with this nonsense.

For the sake of your blood pressure you should probably step away for a bit.

(11-16-2017 12:46 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Guys, you guys cannot stay on friggin' topic. If you don't want to talk about Roy Moore, then don't comment here. There are active threads on the Clintons, Menendez, and Franken.

Whataboutism is what is going on here.

Now, I ask y'all....'Should Roy Moore Withdraw"?

Ok Jr. Mod...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Such anger. Y'all take this shite way too seriously.

As for the topic, I am still waiting for the apology from McConnell, Ryan, McCain, Allred, and the DNC for this disgusting smear tactic.

(11-16-2017 01:50 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Such anger. Y'all take this shite way too seriously.

As for the topic, I am still waiting for the apology from McConnell, Ryan, McCain, Allred, and the DNC for this disgusting smear tactic.

For what? Four more women came forward in the last 2 days.

(11-16-2017 12:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:45 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:42 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:39 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 12:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It's most certainly off topic if Menendez is not accused of any inappropriate sexual activity. And even if he was (which IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to support since you interjected it) this thread is about Moore.

#whataboutism

Relevant because it deals with sexual allegations and politics

Fine...so Menendez has been accused of sexual issues? Why don't you or he provide the ******* link than so we can discuss? You know...like you're supposed to around here!

You aren't sticking to your leftist talking points. No discussion is needed. Accusations are all that's necessary to demand a republican step down, why not for democrats?

Shove your ******* talking points up your ass. Everything you and your minions post could be called a talking point, however WE DON'T SAY A WORD OR GIVE A ****, so knock it the **** off.

My, my.

Rustled jimmies level nearing code red.

Someone get this fella a Fresca, hunh?


Haha. Wow.

(11-16-2017 01:50 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Such anger. Y'all take this shite way too seriously.

As for the topic, I am still waiting for the apology from McConnell, Ryan, McCain, Allred, and the DNC for this disgusting smear tactic.

Are you talking Roy Moore or Bernie now?!?





/ducks

(11-16-2017 02:01 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 01:50 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Such anger. Y'all take this shite way too seriously.

As for the topic, I am still waiting for the apology from McConnell, Ryan, McCain, Allred, and the DNC for this disgusting smear tactic.

For what? Four more women came forward in the last 2 days.

“Came forward” with what?

Underage? Assault? What?

Withdraw? He should move to MN and run for Al Franken's soon to be vacant seat.

(11-16-2017 02:01 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 01:50 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Such anger. Y'all take this shite way too seriously.

As for the topic, I am still waiting for the apology from McConnell, Ryan, McCain, Allred, and the DNC for this disgusting smear tactic.

For what? Four more women came forward in the last 2 days.

came forward with what? Don't tell me, let me guess. Accusations without any sort of evidence. Of course that is enough for the left to convict a republican.

(11-16-2017 03:05 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 02:01 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 01:50 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Such anger. Y'all take this shite way too seriously.

As for the topic, I am still waiting for the apology from McConnell, Ryan, McCain, Allred, and the DNC for this disgusting smear tactic.

For what? Four more women came forward in the last 2 days.

came forward with what? Don't tell me, let me guess. Accusations without any sort of evidence. Of course that is enough for the left to convict a republican.

Nine accusers now. LOL.

(11-16-2017 03:35 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:05 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 02:01 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 01:50 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Such anger. Y'all take this shite way too seriously.

As for the topic, I am still waiting for the apology from McConnell, Ryan, McCain, Allred, and the DNC for this disgusting smear tactic.

For what? Four more women came forward in the last 2 days.

came forward with what? Don't tell me, let me guess. Accusations without any sort of evidence. Of course that is enough for the left to convict a republican.

Nine accusers now. LOL.

how many have evidence?

Just to make sure we are all on the same page here.


Moore is being accused of pedophilia.

Accusations without proof carry no weight in the court of law, only public opinion.

(11-16-2017 03:38 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Just to make sure we are all on the same page here.


Moore is being accused of pedophilia.

again, pick up a Webster's dictionary

(11-16-2017 03:48 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:38 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Just to make sure we are all on the same page here.


Moore is being accused of pedophilia.

again, pick up a Webster's dictionary

The man is being accused of sexually assaulting teenagers. Pedophilia is an attraction to children.

What is the republican alternate definition of this?

I hope you are trolling, I really do