(01-07-2018 08:19 PM)Observer1 Wrote:  

(01-05-2018 10:11 AM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(01-04-2018 10:13 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  Gotcha, the WAC was 2-1 in BCS Bowls much better than the AAC teams that made up CUSA 2.0 during that timeframe.

So UH, Memphis, UCF ECU, Tulsa, Tulane, SMU... were riding the coat tails of the WAC

La Tech is such an after thought, will be totally honest thought you guys were 1-AA until I saw Tech on tv with Sonny as the coach.

You have simply lost your mind dude. YOur jealousy is eating you up. La Tech is so far behind the schools in the AAC its ridiculous. Posting your blind rage over on this board will not change the fact that the game is over for La Tech. It’s okay, find another hobby. I suggest you pick a team from the AAC and start rooting for it. The AAC is on tv all the time unlike Tech so there are lots of opportunities to find us in action. In fact I have just made you an honorary Pirate fan. Cheers

You should crawl back under than rock from 10 years ago, cause I got bad news... Since Dykes came along our two programs trajectories have been a tiny bit different... East Carolina LOL

And yet ECU still has more clout than La Tech as we got invite to AAc and La Tech is in Cusa, nice.

(01-07-2018 08:57 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 08:19 PM)Observer1 Wrote:  

(01-05-2018 10:11 AM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(01-04-2018 10:13 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  Gotcha, the WAC was 2-1 in BCS Bowls much better than the AAC teams that made up CUSA 2.0 during that timeframe.

So UH, Memphis, UCF ECU, Tulsa, Tulane, SMU... were riding the coat tails of the WAC

La Tech is such an after thought, will be totally honest thought you guys were 1-AA until I saw Tech on tv with Sonny as the coach.

You have simply lost your mind dude. YOur jealousy is eating you up. La Tech is so far behind the schools in the AAC its ridiculous. Posting your blind rage over on this board will not change the fact that the game is over for La Tech. It’s okay, find another hobby. I suggest you pick a team from the AAC and start rooting for it. The AAC is on tv all the time unlike Tech so there are lots of opportunities to find us in action. In fact I have just made you an honorary Pirate fan. Cheers

You should crawl back under than rock from 10 years ago, cause I got bad news... Since Dykes came along our two programs trajectories have been a tiny bit different... East Carolina LOL

And yet ECU still has more clout than La Tech as we got invite to AAc and La Tech is in Cusa, nice.

Louisiana tech fan reaching anything his fingers allow him to. Hilarious

MWC chatter

https://www.denverpost.com/2017/12/15/mo...owl-games/

(01-07-2018 06:39 PM)Tigersmoke4 Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 03:40 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 03:03 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 01:01 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 12:14 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  Lol actually it works like this:

P5


AAC


G4

The AAC doubles up the sunbelt and cusa, the mac and midget west are closer but still a long way behind. The AAC is equidistant from the #10 and #1 conferences in performance.

In viewership we have multiple games over 3 million. The midget west has one, every other g4 has zero. We more than double the number of g4 games at 2 million and have almost double the number of g4 games over 1 million.

Think about that 12 teams vs 46 teams and combined you don't equal us. Sure we're all the same lol

Wow, comprehension must be challenging for you. This isn’t a debate, the AAC is the strongest G5 conference by a wide margin. I agree with you. I’m not even sure what you are trying to argue?

Wow maybe you don't understand how groupings work, remember that song one of these are not like the other ones?

A) There are 4 conferences that are indistinguishable from each other of which 1 team has ever done anything. Rarely produce top 25 and historically individual conferences do not produce multiple top 25 teams. Some years the entire group doesn't have multiple teams in the top 25 much less
simultaneously. The mwc clearly dominates this group but the separation is incremental and is mostly due to Boise st. Independent team UMass belongs with this group. Probably Army as well recently in performance, although not historically or financially.

B) There are 5 conferences that have held the traditional college football powers. Virtual equals in historical comparisons to each other. Holding all most all national championships and dominating the top 25. The SEC clearly dominates this group but the separation is incremental between them historically, in performance, and financially. Independent school Notre Dame belongs with this group.

C) There is 1 conference who is twice as good as the first group, but about three fourths as good as the second group. This group has 4 teams that have excelled and/or have tradition (multiple ny6 bowls, multiple rankings) and multiple programs that have produced top 25 teams many simultaneously. Independent school BYU fits with this group. Army belongs here historically and financially, although maybe not recently in performance.

The AAC doesn't belong with group A or B we're an outlier, our goal is to prove we belong with group B. We are doing so in performance, we are beginning to compete in exposure, we have schools who can compare historically, and we are pushing to catch up financially.

Except there is NO INCENTIVE for group b to let you in. Even if you do prove it on the field. It’s 5 power conferences against 1 outlier.

They own the door and have the key. So what exactly is the plan once those P5 conferences poach your strongest schools?

The key to joining the power structure is not A secret. The AAC offered inclusion at the beginning if we could've secured a contract bowl,which was unsuccessful at the time. This is what led to Aresco negotiating for the g5 spot in a NY6 bowl which was basically the old big East slot.The p6 campaign is part of the Aresco plan to elevate the AAC back into our slot thereby reclaiming our power status. IF we can get NBC to legitimately commit to using us to break into college football scene with a decent payout and peach or fiesta bowl tie there's nothing anyone can do about it. I must admit that it pleases me knowing that this truly frightened you g4 trolls

How exactly am I trolling by having a legitimate conversation on a message board? About a topic which, in its title, discusses the impact that UCF has on the non P5 teams. Damn, some of you guys are so insecure.

How does a peach or fiesta tie = CFB inclusion in the current format?? Arguably the best G5 team ever won the peach bowl this year and it’ll only mean a pat on the back.

I just don’t understand the disassociation you have between UCF going undefeated and it bebenfiting all the G5 teams. You know, the topic of conversation in the thread...

(01-07-2018 04:16 PM)BigHouston Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 03:42 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 03:33 PM)wylioats Wrote:  Why are so many of these people (g4) on our board? Wouldn't it be better for these people (g4) to continue their little circle jerk on their own board and stop worrying about what's going on in the AAC. D@mn, talk about insecurity.

Because I like college football and the media only covers the P5. These boards are the best place to discuss G5 football. Why does that upset you?

I like football too and i dont run to yall's boards... I don't give a rat's behind what happens there, doesn't do anything for the AAC much less Houston.

P5

P6




Others - It is what it is

What is your point? I didn’t ask you if you cared about Sunbelt football. I wouldn’t expect you to.

(01-07-2018 08:57 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 08:19 PM)Observer1 Wrote:  

(01-05-2018 10:11 AM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(01-04-2018 10:13 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  Gotcha, the WAC was 2-1 in BCS Bowls much better than the AAC teams that made up CUSA 2.0 during that timeframe.

So UH, Memphis, UCF ECU, Tulsa, Tulane, SMU... were riding the coat tails of the WAC

La Tech is such an after thought, will be totally honest thought you guys were 1-AA until I saw Tech on tv with Sonny as the coach.

You have simply lost your mind dude. YOur jealousy is eating you up. La Tech is so far behind the schools in the AAC its ridiculous. Posting your blind rage over on this board will not change the fact that the game is over for La Tech. It’s okay, find another hobby. I suggest you pick a team from the AAC and start rooting for it. The AAC is on tv all the time unlike Tech so there are lots of opportunities to find us in action. In fact I have just made you an honorary Pirate fan. Cheers

You should crawl back under than rock from 10 years ago, cause I got bad news... Since Dykes came along our two programs trajectories have been a tiny bit different... East Carolina LOL

And yet ECU still has more clout than La Tech as we got invite to AAc and La Tech is in Cusa, nice.

I have more time in my day for Houston banter than ECU, as UH has actually had a pulse the last 5 years...

I do admit though I hadn't put much thought into UH since the last time we played and beat UH at their house. BUT THATS NONE OF MY BUSINESS

(01-08-2018 12:00 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 06:39 PM)Tigersmoke4 Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 03:40 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 03:03 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 01:01 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  Wow, comprehension must be challenging for you. This isn’t a debate, the AAC is the strongest G5 conference by a wide margin. I agree with you. I’m not even sure what you are trying to argue?

Wow maybe you don't understand how groupings work, remember that song one of these are not like the other ones?

A) There are 4 conferences that are indistinguishable from each other of which 1 team has ever done anything. Rarely produce top 25 and historically individual conferences do not produce multiple top 25 teams. Some years the entire group doesn't have multiple teams in the top 25 much less
simultaneously. The mwc clearly dominates this group but the separation is incremental and is mostly due to Boise st. Independent team UMass belongs with this group. Probably Army as well recently in performance, although not historically or financially.

B) There are 5 conferences that have held the traditional college football powers. Virtual equals in historical comparisons to each other. Holding all most all national championships and dominating the top 25. The SEC clearly dominates this group but the separation is incremental between them historically, in performance, and financially. Independent school Notre Dame belongs with this group.

C) There is 1 conference who is twice as good as the first group, but about three fourths as good as the second group. This group has 4 teams that have excelled and/or have tradition (multiple ny6 bowls, multiple rankings) and multiple programs that have produced top 25 teams many simultaneously. Independent school BYU fits with this group. Army belongs here historically and financially, although maybe not recently in performance.

The AAC doesn't belong with group A or B we're an outlier, our goal is to prove we belong with group B. We are doing so in performance, we are beginning to compete in exposure, we have schools who can compare historically, and we are pushing to catch up financially.

Except there is NO INCENTIVE for group b to let you in. Even if you do prove it on the field. It’s 5 power conferences against 1 outlier.

They own the door and have the key. So what exactly is the plan once those P5 conferences poach your strongest schools?

The key to joining the power structure is not A secret. The AAC offered inclusion at the beginning if we could've secured a contract bowl,which was unsuccessful at the time. This is what led to Aresco negotiating for the g5 spot in a NY6 bowl which was basically the old big East slot.The p6 campaign is part of the Aresco plan to elevate the AAC back into our slot thereby reclaiming our power status. IF we can get NBC to legitimately commit to using us to break into college football scene with a decent payout and peach or fiesta bowl tie there's nothing anyone can do about it. I must admit that it pleases me knowing that this truly frightened you g4 trolls

How exactly am I trolling by having a legitimate conversation on a message board? About a topic which, in its title, discusses the impact that UCF has on the non P5 teams. Damn, some of you guys are so insecure.

How does a peach or fiesta tie = CFB inclusion in the current format?? Arguably the best G5 team ever won the peach bowl this year and it’ll only mean a pat on the back.

I just don’t understand the disassociation you have between UCF going undefeated and it bebenfiting all the G5 teams. You know, the topic of conversation in the thread...

Because the bowl tie in is what gave then their autonomy, see this is the problem, you have no idea what you are talking about.

(01-08-2018 03:47 PM)Observer1 Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 08:57 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 08:19 PM)Observer1 Wrote:  

(01-05-2018 10:11 AM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(01-04-2018 10:13 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  Gotcha, the WAC was 2-1 in BCS Bowls much better than the AAC teams that made up CUSA 2.0 during that timeframe.

So UH, Memphis, UCF ECU, Tulsa, Tulane, SMU... were riding the coat tails of the WAC

La Tech is such an after thought, will be totally honest thought you guys were 1-AA until I saw Tech on tv with Sonny as the coach.

You have simply lost your mind dude. YOur jealousy is eating you up. La Tech is so far behind the schools in the AAC its ridiculous. Posting your blind rage over on this board will not change the fact that the game is over for La Tech. It’s okay, find another hobby. I suggest you pick a team from the AAC and start rooting for it. The AAC is on tv all the time unlike Tech so there are lots of opportunities to find us in action. In fact I have just made you an honorary Pirate fan. Cheers

You should crawl back under than rock from 10 years ago, cause I got bad news... Since Dykes came along our two programs trajectories have been a tiny bit different... East Carolina LOL

And yet ECU still has more clout than La Tech as we got invite to AAc and La Tech is in Cusa, nice.

I have more time in my day for Houston banter than ECU, as UH has actually had a pulse the last 5 years...

I do admit though I hadn't put much thought into UH since the last time we played and beat UH at their house. BUT THATS NONE OF MY BUSINESS

ECU was ranked 4 years ago and 10 win season. Nice try

(01-08-2018 08:08 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(01-08-2018 12:00 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 06:39 PM)Tigersmoke4 Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 03:40 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 03:03 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  Wow maybe you don't understand how groupings work, remember that song one of these are not like the other ones?

A) There are 4 conferences that are indistinguishable from each other of which 1 team has ever done anything. Rarely produce top 25 and historically individual conferences do not produce multiple top 25 teams. Some years the entire group doesn't have multiple teams in the top 25 much less
simultaneously. The mwc clearly dominates this group but the separation is incremental and is mostly due to Boise st. Independent team UMass belongs with this group. Probably Army as well recently in performance, although not historically or financially.

B) There are 5 conferences that have held the traditional college football powers. Virtual equals in historical comparisons to each other. Holding all most all national championships and dominating the top 25. The SEC clearly dominates this group but the separation is incremental between them historically, in performance, and financially. Independent school Notre Dame belongs with this group.

C) There is 1 conference who is twice as good as the first group, but about three fourths as good as the second group. This group has 4 teams that have excelled and/or have tradition (multiple ny6 bowls, multiple rankings) and multiple programs that have produced top 25 teams many simultaneously. Independent school BYU fits with this group. Army belongs here historically and financially, although maybe not recently in performance.

The AAC doesn't belong with group A or B we're an outlier, our goal is to prove we belong with group B. We are doing so in performance, we are beginning to compete in exposure, we have schools who can compare historically, and we are pushing to catch up financially.

Except there is NO INCENTIVE for group b to let you in. Even if you do prove it on the field. It’s 5 power conferences against 1 outlier.

They own the door and have the key. So what exactly is the plan once those P5 conferences poach your strongest schools?

The key to joining the power structure is not A secret. The AAC offered inclusion at the beginning if we could've secured a contract bowl,which was unsuccessful at the time. This is what led to Aresco negotiating for the g5 spot in a NY6 bowl which was basically the old big East slot.The p6 campaign is part of the Aresco plan to elevate the AAC back into our slot thereby reclaiming our power status. IF we can get NBC to legitimately commit to using us to break into college football scene with a decent payout and peach or fiesta bowl tie there's nothing anyone can do about it. I must admit that it pleases me knowing that this truly frightened you g4 trolls

How exactly am I trolling by having a legitimate conversation on a message board? About a topic which, in its title, discusses the impact that UCF has on the non P5 teams. Damn, some of you guys are so insecure.

How does a peach or fiesta tie = CFB inclusion in the current format?? Arguably the best G5 team ever won the peach bowl this year and it’ll only mean a pat on the back.

I just don’t understand the disassociation you have between UCF going undefeated and it bebenfiting all the G5 teams. You know, the topic of conversation in the thread...

Because the bowl tie in is what gave then their autonomy, see this is the problem, you have no idea what you are talking about.

Haha, okay. I asked a question. I didn’t make a statement. I can’t wait for UCF, Houston et al. to specifically dump your school and the AAC for good.

Enjoy slurping the leaders of your conference until they leave you behind!

(01-09-2018 06:52 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-08-2018 08:08 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(01-08-2018 12:00 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 06:39 PM)Tigersmoke4 Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 03:40 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  Except there is NO INCENTIVE for group b to let you in. Even if you do prove it on the field. It’s 5 power conferences against 1 outlier.

They own the door and have the key. So what exactly is the plan once those P5 conferences poach your strongest schools?

The key to joining the power structure is not A secret. The AAC offered inclusion at the beginning if we could've secured a contract bowl,which was unsuccessful at the time. This is what led to Aresco negotiating for the g5 spot in a NY6 bowl which was basically the old big East slot.The p6 campaign is part of the Aresco plan to elevate the AAC back into our slot thereby reclaiming our power status. IF we can get NBC to legitimately commit to using us to break into college football scene with a decent payout and peach or fiesta bowl tie there's nothing anyone can do about it. I must admit that it pleases me knowing that this truly frightened you g4 trolls

How exactly am I trolling by having a legitimate conversation on a message board? About a topic which, in its title, discusses the impact that UCF has on the non P5 teams. Damn, some of you guys are so insecure.

How does a peach or fiesta tie = CFB inclusion in the current format?? Arguably the best G5 team ever won the peach bowl this year and it’ll only mean a pat on the back.

I just don’t understand the disassociation you have between UCF going undefeated and it bebenfiting all the G5 teams. You know, the topic of conversation in the thread...

Because the bowl tie in is what gave then their autonomy, see this is the problem, you have no idea what you are talking about.

Haha, okay. I asked a question. I didn’t make a statement. I can’t wait for UCF, Houston et al. to specifically dump your school and the AAC for good.

Enjoy slurping the leaders of your conference until they leave you behind!

You come here claiming la tech dominance by virtue of a win over a lower AAC team with a grad assistant and two week head coach. You be little the conference and declare us blind to our g4 level of access but don't even understand the situation. Don't try to play innocent now your ignorance is revealed.

La Tech would go undefeated in the SEC

LOL, so much coat riding going on the CUSA board. One poster literally said twice that the #6 ranking was a bone thrown to the entire G5, as if somehow that had anything to do CUSA. Unbelievable.

(01-09-2018 08:41 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 06:52 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-08-2018 08:08 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(01-08-2018 12:00 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-07-2018 06:39 PM)Tigersmoke4 Wrote:  The key to joining the power structure is not A secret. The AAC offered inclusion at the beginning if we could've secured a contract bowl,which was unsuccessful at the time. This is what led to Aresco negotiating for the g5 spot in a NY6 bowl which was basically the old big East slot.The p6 campaign is part of the Aresco plan to elevate the AAC back into our slot thereby reclaiming our power status. IF we can get NBC to legitimately commit to using us to break into college football scene with a decent payout and peach or fiesta bowl tie there's nothing anyone can do about it. I must admit that it pleases me knowing that this truly frightened you g4 trolls

How exactly am I trolling by having a legitimate conversation on a message board? About a topic which, in its title, discusses the impact that UCF has on the non P5 teams. Damn, some of you guys are so insecure.

How does a peach or fiesta tie = CFB inclusion in the current format?? Arguably the best G5 team ever won the peach bowl this year and it’ll only mean a pat on the back.

I just don’t understand the disassociation you have between UCF going undefeated and it bebenfiting all the G5 teams. You know, the topic of conversation in the thread...

Because the bowl tie in is what gave then their autonomy, see this is the problem, you have no idea what you are talking about.

Haha, okay. I asked a question. I didn’t make a statement. I can’t wait for UCF, Houston et al. to specifically dump your school and the AAC for good.

Enjoy slurping the leaders of your conference until they leave you behind!

You come here claiming la tech dominance by virtue of a win over a lower AAC team with a grad assistant and two week head coach. You be little the conference and declare us blind to our g4 level of access but don't even understand the situation. Don't try to play innocent now your ignorance is revealed.

Umm, no. I went to App State. I cheer for App State. I could give two flying ***** about LA Tech. Try again.

(01-10-2018 05:42 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 08:41 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 06:52 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-08-2018 08:08 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(01-08-2018 12:00 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  How exactly am I trolling by having a legitimate conversation on a message board? About a topic which, in its title, discusses the impact that UCF has on the non P5 teams. Damn, some of you guys are so insecure.

How does a peach or fiesta tie = CFB inclusion in the current format?? Arguably the best G5 team ever won the peach bowl this year and it’ll only mean a pat on the back.

I just don’t understand the disassociation you have between UCF going undefeated and it bebenfiting all the G5 teams. You know, the topic of conversation in the thread...

Because the bowl tie in is what gave then their autonomy, see this is the problem, you have no idea what you are talking about.

Haha, okay. I asked a question. I didn’t make a statement. I can’t wait for UCF, Houston et al. to specifically dump your school and the AAC for good.

Enjoy slurping the leaders of your conference until they leave you behind!

You come here claiming la tech dominance by virtue of a win over a lower AAC team with a grad assistant and two week head coach. You be little the conference and declare us blind to our g4 level of access but don't even understand the situation. Don't try to play innocent now your ignorance is revealed.

Umm, no. I went to App State. I cheer for App State. I could give two flying ***** about LA Tech. Try again.

What's really funny is that Tech beat the AAC runner-up in a bowl game just last year clueless

(01-10-2018 06:09 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(01-10-2018 05:42 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 08:41 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 06:52 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-08-2018 08:08 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  Because the bowl tie in is what gave then their autonomy, see this is the problem, you have no idea what you are talking about.

Haha, okay. I asked a question. I didn’t make a statement. I can’t wait for UCF, Houston et al. to specifically dump your school and the AAC for good.

Enjoy slurping the leaders of your conference until they leave you behind!

You come here claiming la tech dominance by virtue of a win over a lower AAC team with a grad assistant and two week head coach. You be little the conference and declare us blind to our g4 level of access but don't even understand the situation. Don't try to play innocent now your ignorance is revealed.

Umm, no. I went to App State. I cheer for App State. I could give two flying ***** about LA Tech. Try again.

What's really funny is that Tech beat the AAC runner-up in a bowl game just last year

When the AAC runner-up is missing almost half the starters from the team that won the division in October and November, the CUSA runner-up can eke out a last second field goal win.
Nine months later, that AAC runner-up healed up beats the eventual CUSA runaway champ by three scores, but goes 4-4 in AAC.

Similarly, another 4-4 AAC team beates the other CUSA division winner by three scores.
But when they have no coaching staff, plays are called by a grad assistant, the interim coach the players were lobbying for departs, so that the new head coach knowing neither the terminology of the team's system nor the players' names is on the sideline...then a CUSA team can beat them badly.

That sums up the difference - you need the direst of circumstances for the AAC team to get these LaTech/CUSA wins of which you are SO proud.

Meanwhile, 32-16 over 3 years (yes, sunshine, bowls included) over the G4.

(01-10-2018 06:16 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(01-10-2018 06:09 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(01-10-2018 05:42 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 08:41 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 06:52 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  Haha, okay. I asked a question. I didn’t make a statement. I can’t wait for UCF, Houston et al. to specifically dump your school and the AAC for good.

Enjoy slurping the leaders of your conference until they leave you behind!

You come here claiming la tech dominance by virtue of a win over a lower AAC team with a grad assistant and two week head coach. You be little the conference and declare us blind to our g4 level of access but don't even understand the situation. Don't try to play innocent now your ignorance is revealed.

Umm, no. I went to App State. I cheer for App State. I could give two flying ***** about LA Tech. Try again.

What's really funny is that Tech beat the AAC runner-up in a bowl game just last year

When the AAC runner-up is missing almost half the starters from the team that won the division in October and November, the CUSA runner-up can eke out a last second field goal win.
Nine months later, that AAC runner-up healed up beats the eventual CUSA runaway champ by three scores, but goes 4-4 in AAC.

Similarly, another 4-4 AAC team beates the other CUSA division winner by three scores.
But when they have no coaching staff, plays are called by a grad assistant, the interim coach the players were lobbying for departs, so that the new head coach knowing neither the terminology of the team's system nor the players' names is on the sideline...then a CUSA team can beat them badly.

That sums up the difference - you need the direst of circumstances for the AAC team to get these LaTech/CUSA wins of which you are SO proud.

Meanwhile, 32-16 over 3 years (yes, sunshine, bowls included) over the G4.

Yes we all know about the AAC the league of excuses, Memphis excuse for losing to WKU last Year, USF excuse for losing to WKU in 2015, SMU excuse for losing 42-3 to Tech, Houston excuse for getting whipped by SDSU and on on on on on

The better team won that day plain and simple, Personally I think excuses are for losers and each must own his victories and losses

BTW Tech had 52 players on the team injured some time during the season this year. Injuries are a part of the game

NAVY is truly a plug a play system, triple option that doesn't rely on the athleticism abilities of few playermakers like most G5 colleges rely on

(01-10-2018 06:26 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(01-10-2018 06:16 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(01-10-2018 06:09 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(01-10-2018 05:42 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 08:41 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  You come here claiming la tech dominance by virtue of a win over a lower AAC team with a grad assistant and two week head coach. You be little the conference and declare us blind to our g4 level of access but don't even understand the situation. Don't try to play innocent now your ignorance is revealed.

Umm, no. I went to App State. I cheer for App State. I could give two flying ***** about LA Tech. Try again.

What's really funny is that Tech beat the AAC runner-up in a bowl game just last year

When the AAC runner-up is missing almost half the starters from the team that won the division in October and November, the CUSA runner-up can eke out a last second field goal win.
Nine months later, that AAC runner-up healed up beats the eventual CUSA runaway champ by three scores, but goes 4-4 in AAC.

Similarly, another 4-4 AAC team beates the other CUSA division winner by three scores.
But when they have no coaching staff, plays are called by a grad assistant, the interim coach the players were lobbying for departs, so that the new head coach knowing neither the terminology of the team's system nor the players' names is on the sideline...then a CUSA team can beat them badly.

That sums up the difference - you need the direst of circumstances for the AAC team to get these LaTech/CUSA wins of which you are SO proud.

Meanwhile, 32-16 over 3 years (yes, sunshine, bowls included) over the G4.

Yes we all know about the AAC the league of excuses, Memphis excuse for losing to WKU last Year, USF excuse for losing to WKU in 2015, SMU excuse for losing 42-3 to Tech, Houston excuse for getting whipped by SDSU and on on on on on

The better team won that day plain and simple, Personally I think excuses are for losers and each must own his victories and losses

BTW Tech had 52 players on the team injured some time during the season this year. Injuries are a part of the game

NAVY is truly a plug a play system, triple option that doesn't rely on the athleticism abilities of few playermakers like most G5 colleges rely on

Not an excuse. Said it going back to the day of the game - good win LaTech and congratulations.

What I am saying is that it is not a valid dataset supporting your argument of equality. Compared to your 52 injuries, Navy lost 108 GAMES from starters/key contributors that year. I've listed in another thread the nearly half of starters on O and D who were there in October and not on 23 December. It's just not data to be used in any real comparison.

Just like the SMU case - which is better data from which to draw conclusion: team at strength, or team with GA calling plays?

That's what I am saying - you have cherrypicked terrible examples from an analytical standpoint, and choose to ignore the big, valid dataset of 32-16.

(01-10-2018 06:36 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(01-10-2018 06:26 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(01-10-2018 06:16 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(01-10-2018 06:09 PM)Dawgxas Wrote:  

(01-10-2018 05:42 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  Umm, no. I went to App State. I cheer for App State. I could give two flying ***** about LA Tech. Try again.

What's really funny is that Tech beat the AAC runner-up in a bowl game just last year

When the AAC runner-up is missing almost half the starters from the team that won the division in October and November, the CUSA runner-up can eke out a last second field goal win.
Nine months later, that AAC runner-up healed up beats the eventual CUSA runaway champ by three scores, but goes 4-4 in AAC.

Similarly, another 4-4 AAC team beates the other CUSA division winner by three scores.
But when they have no coaching staff, plays are called by a grad assistant, the interim coach the players were lobbying for departs, so that the new head coach knowing neither the terminology of the team's system nor the players' names is on the sideline...then a CUSA team can beat them badly.

That sums up the difference - you need the direst of circumstances for the AAC team to get these LaTech/CUSA wins of which you are SO proud.

Meanwhile, 32-16 over 3 years (yes, sunshine, bowls included) over the G4.

Yes we all know about the AAC the league of excuses, Memphis excuse for losing to WKU last Year, USF excuse for losing to WKU in 2015, SMU excuse for losing 42-3 to Tech, Houston excuse for getting whipped by SDSU and on on on on on

The better team won that day plain and simple, Personally I think excuses are for losers and each must own his victories and losses

BTW Tech had 52 players on the team injured some time during the season this year. Injuries are a part of the game

NAVY is truly a plug a play system, triple option that doesn't rely on the athleticism abilities of few playermakers like most G5 colleges rely on

Not an excuse. Said it going back to the day of the game - good win LaTech and congratulations.

What I am saying is that it is not a valid dataset supporting your argument of equality. Compared to your 52 injuries, Navy lost 108 GAMES from starters/key contributors that year. I've listed in another thread the nearly half of starters on O and D who were there in October and not on 23 December. It's just not data to be used in any real comparison.

Just like the SMU case - which is better data from which to draw conclusion: team at strength, or team with GA calling plays?

That's what I am saying - you have cherrypicked terrible examples from an analytical standpoint, and choose to ignore the big, valid dataset of 32-16.

Here's another valid dataset: the other G5 conferences are 10-2 versus the AAC in bowl games

The top G5 teams are better than the AAC top teams.

And according to your dataset the bottom G5 teams are worse than the bottom AAC teams.

(01-10-2018 05:42 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 08:41 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(01-09-2018 06:52 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  

(01-08-2018 08:08 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(01-08-2018 12:00 PM)ah59396 Wrote:  How exactly am I trolling by having a legitimate conversation on a message board? About a topic which, in its title, discusses the impact that UCF has on the non P5 teams. Damn, some of you guys are so insecure.

How does a peach or fiesta tie = CFB inclusion in the current format?? Arguably the best G5 team ever won the peach bowl this year and it’ll only mean a pat on the back.

I just don’t understand the disassociation you have between UCF going undefeated and it bebenfiting all the G5 teams. You know, the topic of conversation in the thread...

Because the bowl tie in is what gave then their autonomy, see this is the problem, you have no idea what you are talking about.

Haha, okay. I asked a question. I didn’t make a statement. I can’t wait for UCF, Houston et al. to specifically dump your school and the AAC for good.

Enjoy slurping the leaders of your conference until they leave you behind!

You come here claiming la tech dominance by virtue of a win over a lower AAC team with a grad assistant and two week head coach. You be little the conference and declare us blind to our g4 level of access but don't even understand the situation. Don't try to play innocent now your ignorance is revealed.

Umm, no. I went to App State. I cheer for App State. I could give two flying ***** about LA Tech. Try again.

My bad on the school, I know it's probably wrong to say but well, it's true; all you g4's look the same to me and I really can't tell you apart.

I'm waiting for a reply full of more excuses