Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Divisions are done in 2023!
Author Message
georgia_tech_swagger Offline
Res publica non dominetur
*

Posts: 51,449
Joined: Feb 2002
Reputation: 2027
I Root For: GT, USCU, FU, WYO
Location: Upstate, SC

SkunkworksFolding@NCAAbbsNCAAbbs LUGCrappies
Post: #101
RE: Divisions are done in 2023!
(06-28-2022 10:26 AM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  Georgia Tech: Clemson, Louisville, Wake Forest


Well, the ACC got 1 of the 3 right. Pretty ****** outcome for GT.
06-30-2022 09:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
esayem Online
Hark The Sound!
*

Posts: 16,731
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 1267
I Root For: Olde Ironclad
Location: Tobacco Road
Post: #102
RE: Divisions are done in 2023!
We don’t really know how this was decided, but I’m assuming each school was able to put together some sort of list of preferences and I have the feeling BC and Syracuse strategically selected Miami and FSU as highest priority.

I also agree with people pointing out that adding a yearly cream puff balances out the schedule and this may have been a factor.

I’m more mystified by Louisville getting the Tobacco Road treatment!
06-30-2022 09:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
esayem Online
Hark The Sound!
*

Posts: 16,731
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 1267
I Root For: Olde Ironclad
Location: Tobacco Road
Post: #103
RE: Divisions are done in 2023!
(06-30-2022 09:32 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  
(06-28-2022 10:26 AM)Lenvillecards Wrote:  Georgia Tech: Clemson, Louisville, Wake Forest


Well, the ACC got 1 of the 3 right. Pretty ****** outcome for GT.

Wake is essentially a replacement for Duke because the Devils took State from the Deacs. It’s a similar game for the Engineers, but one that hasn’t been seen much the past 20 years.

The Louisville matchup makes no sense. Should have been FSU, but I bet Louisville put GT and Miami as their top two and the ACC gave them UVA as their third by default
06-30-2022 09:37 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
georgia_tech_swagger Offline
Res publica non dominetur
*

Posts: 51,449
Joined: Feb 2002
Reputation: 2027
I Root For: GT, USCU, FU, WYO
Location: Upstate, SC

SkunkworksFolding@NCAAbbsNCAAbbs LUGCrappies
Post: #104
RE: Divisions are done in 2023!
(06-28-2022 02:19 PM)Ragu Wrote:  The league definitely needed the massive Louisville vs Georgia tech rivalry that spans a gigantic 2 total games.

FSU vs Georgia tech didn't make more sense than that or anything. Gotta have that slobber knocker FSU vs Syracuse matchup for TV !

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Louisville seems to have always wanted the game. GT has no interest.
06-30-2022 09:37 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
georgia_tech_swagger Offline
Res publica non dominetur
*

Posts: 51,449
Joined: Feb 2002
Reputation: 2027
I Root For: GT, USCU, FU, WYO
Location: Upstate, SC

SkunkworksFolding@NCAAbbsNCAAbbs LUGCrappies
Post: #105
RE: Divisions are done in 2023!
So, having looked at rotational schedules for GT ... this is a pretty definitive downgrade in scheduling for GT. We see the northeastern schools more now. We see regional schools less now. GT's three permanent rivals are The Battle of I-85 which is dampened by GT being at a multi-generational nadir while Clemson is at its all time best .... a school with no history GT has no interest in playing .... and a school with no fanbase and very modest history which doesn't move the needle either.

And with Geoff Collins at the helm, they will ***NEVER*** win any of those permanent "rival" games, so they'll just die harder in the short term.

I had modest to low expectations of the ACC with divisionless schedules. I'm still disappointed.
06-30-2022 09:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BePcr07 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,953
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation: 359
I Root For: Boise St & Zags
Location:
Post: #106
RE: Divisions are done in 2023!
My predictions were (incorrect = red):

Boston College: Miami, Pittsburgh, Syracuse
Clemson: Florida St, Georgia Tech, North Carolina St
Duke: North Carolina, Virginia, Wake Forest
Florida St: Clemson, Georgia Tech, Miami
Georgia Tech: Clemson, Florida St, Wake Forest
Louisville: Pittsburgh, Syracuse, Virginia Tech
Miami: Boston College, Florida St, Virginia Tech
North Carolina: Duke, North Carolina St, Virginia
North Carolina St: Clemson, North Carolina, Wake Forest
Pittsburgh: Boston College, Louisville, Syracuse
Syracuse: Boston College, Louisville, Pittsburgh
Virginia: Duke, North Carolina, Virginia Tech
Virginia Tech: Louisville, Miami, Virginia
Wake Forest: Duke, Georgia Tech, North Carolina St

How'd I do?

3/3: Boston College, Clemson, North Carolina
2/3: Duke, Florida St, Georgia Tech, Miami, North Carolina St, Pittsburgh, Syracuse, Virginia, Wake Forest
1/3: Virginia Tech
0/3: Louisville

Out of 21 annual matchups, I got 14 right (67%).

In order, my incorrect picks that I'm most surprised did not happen:
1) Florida St - Georgia Tech
2) North Carolina St - Wake Forest
3) Duke - Virginia
4) Louisville - Pittsburgh
5) Louisville - Virginia Tech
6) Miami - Virginia Tech
7) Louisville - Syracuse

How Georgia Tech came out with no Florida school is baffling. Someone was looking out for Louisville.
(This post was last modified: 06-30-2022 10:17 AM by BePcr07.)
06-30-2022 10:16 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
green Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 11,468
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 391
I Root For: Miami
Location:
Post: #107
RE: Divisions are done in 2023!
Quote:Duke and Georgia Tech have met 85 times on the football field. Only North Carolina (104) and Wake Forest (98) have been more common opponents for Duke. The Blue Devils and Yellow Jackets first met in 1933 and haven’t missed a season since then, a pretty long run for two schools that aren’t in the same state and weren’t in the same conference until 1979.

DISPOSABLE RAZOR
06-30-2022 10:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wahoowa84 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,525
Joined: Oct 2017
Reputation: 516
I Root For: UVa
Location:
Post: #108
RE: Divisions are done in 2023!
(06-30-2022 09:32 AM)esayem Wrote:  We don’t really know how this was decided, but I’m assuming each school was able to put together some sort of list of preferences and I have the feeling BC and Syracuse strategically selected Miami and FSU as highest priority.

I also agree with people pointing out that adding a yearly cream puff balances out the schedule and this may have been a factor.

I’m more mystified by Louisville getting the Tobacco Road treatment!

^this

I’m beginning to wonder if Louisville’s AD has a doctorate in Game Theory and completely outplayed their hand. They seemed to have understood the dynamics and leveraged opportunities. Should help further integrate into the ACC. IMO - VT also had a fortunate, strong first decade in the ACC.
06-30-2022 11:21 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
esayem Online
Hark The Sound!
*

Posts: 16,731
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 1267
I Root For: Olde Ironclad
Location: Tobacco Road
Post: #109
RE: Divisions are done in 2023!
(06-30-2022 10:52 AM)green Wrote:  
Quote:Duke and Georgia Tech have met 85 times on the football field. Only North Carolina (104) and Wake Forest (98) have been more common opponents for Duke. The Blue Devils and Yellow Jackets first met in 1933 and haven’t missed a season since then, a pretty long run for two schools that aren’t in the same state and weren’t in the same conference until 1979.

DISPOSABLE RAZOR

Yeah that sucks just like Wake being off the Tar Heel schedule every two seasons.
06-30-2022 12:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
random asian guy Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,271
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 342
I Root For: VT, Georgetown
Location:
Post: #110
RE: Divisions are done in 2023!
Shall we take a look at the basketball rival setup?

*Basketball*

Boston College: Syracuse, ND
Clemson: Florida State, Georgia Tech
Duke: North Carolina, Wake Forest
Florida State: Clemson, Miami
Georgia Tech: Clemson, ND
Louisville: Pitt, Virginia
Miami: Florida State, VT
North Carolina: Duke, NC State
NC State: Duke, WF
Pitt: Syracuse, Louisville
Syracuse: Boston College, Pitt
Virginia: Louisville, Virginia Tech
Virginia Tech: Virginia, Miami
Wake Forest: Duke, NCSU

Assuming the Basketball rivalry setup reflects the true rivals each team wants to play, except for Louisville which inherited UMCP’s rivals, most people including myself thought the fooball permanent rivals would be similar to the basketball rivals.

Now let’s see the football side again.

*Football*
Boston College: Miami, Pitt, Syracuse
Clemson: Florida State, Georgia Tech, NC State
Duke: North Carolina, NC State, Wake Forest
Florida State: Clemson, Miami, Syracuse
Georgia Tech: Clemson, Louisville, Wake Forest
Louisville: Georgia Tech, Miami, Virginia
Miami: Boston College, Florida State, Louisville
North Carolina: Duke, NC State, Virginia
NC State: Clemson, Duke, North Carolina
Pitt: Boston College, Syracuse, Virginia Tech
Syracuse: Boston College, Florida State, Pitt
Virginia: Louisville, North Carolina, Virginia Tech
Virginia Tech: Pitt, Virginia, Wake Forest
Wake Forest: Duke, Georgia Tech, Virginia Tech

My thoughts are below:

Boston College: BC got what it wants. Cuse is the basketball rival. Pitt is the other NE team and BC wants Miami for history and Florida exposure

Clemson: Clemson got what it wants. FSU and GT are already basketball rivals. NC State is a good third rival for them.

Duke: UNC and WF are already basketball rivals. For the third rivals, I think Duke must have chosen NC State over GT because both NC State and GT, facing mighty Clemson every year, probably wanted to have Duke for the balance of schedule (and of course for history)

Florida State: Clemson and Miami are already basketball rivals. I think FSU wanted someone easier for the third rival. BC and Louisville got Miami. GT and NC state probably didn’t want to have Clemson and FSU on their schedule every year. VT sadly prefers a soft schedule. Still not sure why FSU didn’t get Wake or UVa. Maybe FSU does want to play in the state of New York or the league pushed Florida schools to take one of NE schools.

Georgia Tech: Clemson is a basketball rival. Facing Clemson every year, I guess GT didn’t want to have FSU or Miami as a permanenr rival. Other than Clemson and FSU, it doesn’t look like GT has any real rival. UNC, Duke, and NC State are playing themshelves. VT chose Pitt over GT (for history I guess) and UVa chose Louisvile over GT (for travelling fans I guess). Or maybe the league asked VT and UVa to take Pitt and Louisville for a better integration.

Louisville: Louisville’s rivals were hard to predict as Louisville didn’t have much history with the rest of ACC teams. BC-Cuse-Pitt play each other but didn’t pick Louisville. However, Louisville fans must travell well. I think Miami chose Louisville over Pitt and UVa chose Louisville over WF. GT-Louiville might be the last remaining teams to be paired.

Miami: Florida State is already any basketball rival and an obvious choice. I am not sure if Miami dropped VT because Miami doesn’t want to play both FSU and VT every year anymore, or VT dropped Miami to have an easier schedule, or both. BC, Cuse, Pitt, and Louisville probably wanted to play Miami. Not sure exactly why but Miami chose BC (I guess a better destination?) and Louisivlle (better travelling fans?). Maybe the ACC was involved here.

North Carolina: UNC got what it wants...as always

NC State: I think NC State dropped Wake here as opposed Wake dropping NC State because my understanding is Wake likes NC schools and the fact that NCSU’s fans filling up Wake’s stadium. From NCSU’s perspective, Clemson& Duke combo is probably more artracitve than WF&Duke or Clemson&WF.

Syracuse: Cuse almost got what it wants. Boston College and Pitt are already basketball rivals. I think Cuse would prefer Miami to FSU but it seems like Miami chose BC and Louisville over Cuse. FSU is still a second best option for Cuse for recuiting

Pitt: Cuse is a basketabll rival. Pitt has better recruiting ground than BC and Cuse and therefore a recruiting potential seems to be a less factor for Pitt. Instead, Pitt went for histrocal rivals. Cuse is histrocally a rival while Louisville is not. Pitt has probably preferred Miami over VT but Miami chose Louisville and BC instead. VT would be a reasonable fall back option for Pitt.

Virginia: North Carolina and Virginia Tech are obvious picks. Sticking to Louisville is a puzzling choice. The other options would be WF and GT. I think WF chose VT over UVa. And I guess UVa chose Louisville over GT for better travelling fans.

Virginia Tech: Virginia is an obvious pick. As for Miami, I suspect VT backed out to have an easy schedule. But it might have been Miami dropping VT. Wake is a reasonable choice given VT wants to play in the state of North Carolina and Wake is the only available NC school. For the third rival, VT’s choice would be Pitt, Louisville or GT. FSU is too strong and BC and Cuse already got what they want. Louisville isn’t good for recruiting and VT won’t need Louisville’s travelling fans as much. GT would be good for recruiting but I guess VT chose Pitt over GT for Big East history.

Wake Forest: Duke is a basketball rival. The other basketball rival, NCSU, chose Clemson and Duke over Wake. Then WF’s next choices would be Lousville, GT, VT and UVa. VT is geographically close and their fans will travel to WF. No need to have two Virginia schools for recuriting reason, so UVa is out. For the third rival, either Louisville preferred GT and UVa over Wake, or Wake preferred GT over Louisville for recruiting and history.
06-30-2022 01:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.