Sticks and stones...toughen up. But still that was not the question to be answered so I question your reading comprehension. You seem to blame the inanimate object or lack of inanimate object to support your point. You completely disregard the human decision or act/responsibility. That is what I wanted you to address..

You and I will disagree on what is acceptable speech. I just lean toward free speech that is all.

(07-15-2014 10:33 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Sticks and stones...toughen up. But still that was not the question to be answered so I question your reading comprehension. You seem to blame the inanimate object or lack of inanimate object to support your point. You completely disregard the human decision or act/responsibility. That is what I wanted you to address..

You and I will disagree on what is acceptable speech. I just lean toward free speech that is all.

Free speech?


OOOOOH, you mean where lefties can say whatever they want and it's acceptable (or better be), but righties can't say whatever they want without offending someone...

"Sticks and stones may brake my bones but words will never hurt me". That is what I meant by Free speech. I am tired of this movement from the progressives that want to eliminate words, control a persons' lexicon and thoughts.

When did the US particularly American men become so soft and are consumed with being offended??

You can say whatever you want and I reserve the right to call you out on it.

(07-15-2014 10:24 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(07-14-2014 08:07 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-14-2014 01:58 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  

(07-14-2014 12:33 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(07-14-2014 12:17 PM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  Ooookayyyy.....

Now I never want to hear any comment on having too many guns or any new gun legislation from any left wingers!

And I don't want to hear any complaints when people characterize gun nuts as people desiring to obtain guns in order to compensate for some sense of sexual inadequacy...

So long as we're comparing sex to guns

And the correct analogy is that I'm advocating safety measures, like trigger locks.

It all boils down to sex with you Tom...

Any way, it is interesting that you using "GUN NUTS" is acceptable, but "TRANNY" is offensive to you...ha!! Gun ownership a Right protected by the US Constitution!

Even more interesting is that in both analogies...you blame the inanimate objects (lack of condums or firearms) for murder or killing of humans, not the human act.

Tommy, I have to say The Duke raises a good point. Let me keep reading the thread and see how you responded.

Gun nuts refers to the political beliefs of the person. "Tranny" describes a person in their totality. Calling someone a "libtard" isn't the same as calling someone the N-word.

Thanks for letting us all know what is "acceptable" and what isn't. What a world we live in, LazyTom will let us know when it's okay that we speak.

How long is your list going to be? Can you simply start another thread and add to it over time so can make double stuffed doubled sure that whatever we may utter passes the Department of Acceptable and Universally Un-Ooooffesive Words, Speech, Sign Language or Facial Expressions?

We can call it the DAUUOWSLFE. not exactly the same ring as LGBTQIALMNOPMOUSE, or whatever it is, but I think we can make it work.

That'd be great, thanks!

(07-15-2014 10:42 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  You can say whatever you want and I reserve the right to call you out on it.

Whatever you say......

But in the real world and if we were face to face...you have the right to "call me out"... just as I would have the right to knock you down as well!

So carry on...just grow up and toughen up ladies and pull your skirts up!

Lol the guy throwing around physical violence is telling me to grow up. K.

(07-14-2014 12:56 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-14-2014 07:55 AM)Crebman Wrote:  

(07-14-2014 07:40 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

Quote:HIV infections are rising among gay men in many parts of the world, the World Health Organization warned Friday, urging all men who have sex with men to take antiretroviral drugs to prevent infection.

"We are seeing exploding epidemics," warned Gottfried Hirnschall, who heads WHO's HIV department.

Infection rates are rising again among men who have sex with men -- the group at the epicentre of AIDS pandemic when it first emerged 33 years ago, he told reporters in Geneva.

While images of skeletal men dying of AIDS in the 1980s pushed the world to act, a younger generation that has grown up among new treatments that make it possible to live with HIV are less focused on the disease, he suggested.

Today, this group is 19 times more likely than the general population to be infected by HIV, Hirnschall said.

In Bangkok for instance, the incidence of HIV among men who have sex with men stands at 5.7 percent, compared to less than 1.0 percent for the overall population, he said.

http://www.afp.com/en/news/who-warns-hiv...tive-drugs

Now you went and stirred up the hornets nest. The "gay brigade" will be here soon to try and brow beat you into believing that gay males and HIV have no correlations with each other.

HIV/AIDS is a worldwide issue...not a 'gay problem'...worldwide most people with HIV/AIDS are sub-saharan africans...I hope we find a cure.

But this idea of only viewing HIV/AIDS through some gay lens is not only inaccurate, but cruel.

This is America, not sub-Saharan Africa

JD,

Not threatening you in the least. I was just saying that would be the response. I guess you like to do the calling out ...just so long as you are not called out?! By the way are you in or "out"?

(07-15-2014 11:04 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(07-14-2014 12:56 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-14-2014 07:55 AM)Crebman Wrote:  

(07-14-2014 07:40 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

Quote:HIV infections are rising among gay men in many parts of the world, the World Health Organization warned Friday, urging all men who have sex with men to take antiretroviral drugs to prevent infection.

"We are seeing exploding epidemics," warned Gottfried Hirnschall, who heads WHO's HIV department.

Infection rates are rising again among men who have sex with men -- the group at the epicentre of AIDS pandemic when it first emerged 33 years ago, he told reporters in Geneva.

While images of skeletal men dying of AIDS in the 1980s pushed the world to act, a younger generation that has grown up among new treatments that make it possible to live with HIV are less focused on the disease, he suggested.

Today, this group is 19 times more likely than the general population to be infected by HIV, Hirnschall said.

In Bangkok for instance, the incidence of HIV among men who have sex with men stands at 5.7 percent, compared to less than 1.0 percent for the overall population, he said.

http://www.afp.com/en/news/who-warns-hiv...tive-drugs

Now you went and stirred up the hornets nest. The "gay brigade" will be here soon to try and brow beat you into believing that gay males and HIV have no correlations with each other.

HIV/AIDS is a worldwide issue...not a 'gay problem'...worldwide most people with HIV/AIDS are sub-saharan africans...I hope we find a cure.

But this idea of only viewing HIV/AIDS through some gay lens is not only inaccurate, but cruel.

This is America, not sub-Saharan Africa

Try and keep up...

http://csnbbs.com/thread-694940-post-109...id10905264

The title clearly says WHO...WORLD Health Organization...not US health organization

This is America, not sub-Saharan Africa
[/quote]

Was that last you checked?

(07-15-2014 11:17 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  JD,

Not threatening you in the least. I was just saying that would be the response. I guess you like to do the calling out ...just so long as you are not called out?! By the way are you in or "out"?

You can call me out all you want.

(07-15-2014 11:35 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-15-2014 11:04 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

This is America, not sub-Saharan Africa

Was that last you checked?
[/quote]

Just checked again.....yep, this is still Murica!

(07-15-2014 11:43 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(07-15-2014 11:35 AM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-15-2014 11:04 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

This is America, not sub-Saharan Africa

Was that last you checked?

Just checked again.....yep, this is still Murica!
[/quote]

At least you know that much.

(07-15-2014 11:42 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(07-15-2014 11:17 AM)South Carolina Duke Wrote:  JD,

Not threatening you in the least. I was just saying that would be the response. I guess you like to do the calling out ...just so long as you are not called out?! By the way are you in or "out"?

You can call me out all you want.

REPORTED! I'm offended because you're telling me what I can do.

(07-15-2014 12:03 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

I'll take it you missed the sarcasm... C'mon maaaaaaan

(07-15-2014 12:05 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-15-2014 12:03 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

I'll take it you missed the sarcasm... C'mon maaaaaaan

I was saying more of a, youre crazy if you thought the post was funny

(07-15-2014 02:21 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(07-15-2014 12:05 PM)LSU04_08 Wrote:  

(07-15-2014 12:03 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

I'll take it you missed the sarcasm... C'mon maaaaaaan

I was saying more of a, youre crazy if you thought the post was funny

Better be what you're saying lol