Click Pic for video..

This is the official position of the Democratic party. As I have said, abortion is just political policy for the Dems. Murdering babies means nothing to them.

Quote:Sen. Rand Paul’s abortion question is beginning to haunt Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz – thanks to some in the media.

During a CNN interview on April 14, DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) refused to cite any acceptable restrictions on abortion – and deemed the decision to abort a 7-pound baby a “personal liberty.” The abortion question continued to follow her during a Fox interview where she couldn’t pick a “specific date and time” for when life begins.

The issue arose when a New Hampshire journalist asked Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) about his stance on abortion April 8. The 2016 presidential candidate retorted, “You go back and you ask [Rep.] Debbie Wasserman Schultz if she’s OK with killing a seven-pound baby that is just not yet born yet.”

Exposing a media double-standard, Sen. Paul continued, “When you get an answer from Debbie, come back to me.”

Hours later, Rep. Wasserman Schultz replied to Sen. Paul (but not, of course, because the media asked her).

“I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period," she wrote in a DNC statement.

During a CNN interview with host Wolf Blitzer later that day, Sen. Paul translated her stance.

“Debbie's position, which I guess is the Democrat party position, that an abortion all the way up until the day of birth would be fine,” he said.

Six days later, Blitzer followed up on Sen. Paul’s statement in an interview with Rep. Wasserman Schultz.

“[I]s he right when he says that it's okay from your perspective to kill a 7-pound baby in uterus, is that your position?” he asked. (Note: Blitzer actually used the word “kill.”)

“We have very different definitions of personal liberty,” she said. “The Democratic Party’s position is that we are pro-choice.”

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/katie-yoder...RyaeM.dpuf

So we all have this straight, we can infer from the DNC Party Chair: Infanticide is a plank in the DNC Party Platform. Got it.

ERC, if your wife was pregnant with a 7 pound baby and the doctors told you that your wife would die during child birth, would you want the government to make the decision on whose life to save, or would you want to make that decision yourself in consultation with your doctor?

The democratic position is that it should be made by the family and the doctor.

Your continual assertion that anyone in favor of abortion rights supports murder and/or that it means nothing to them is disgusting and highly offensive.

(04-16-2015 10:51 AM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  So we all have this straight, we can infer from the DNC Party Chair: Infanticide is a plank in the DNC Party Platform. Got it.

What is your answer to my question?

(04-16-2015 10:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  ERC, if your wife was pregnant with a 7 pound baby and the doctors told you that your wife would die during child birth, would you want the government to make the decision on whose life to save, or would you want to make that decision yourself in consultation with your doctor?

The democratic position is that it should be made by the family and the doctor.

Your continual assertion that anyone in favor of abortion rights supports murder and/or that it means nothing to them is disgusting and highly offensive.

She said nothing of that scenerio. You are implying an exception (life of the mother). From what I am reading, she doesn't want to ban the late term abortion at all, with or without the exception.

(04-16-2015 10:56 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 10:51 AM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  So we all have this straight, we can infer from the DNC Party Chair: Infanticide is a plank in the DNC Party Platform. Got it.

What is your answer to my question?

BTW I am a woman.

In that instance, I can unequivocally say that 'd save the baby and sacrifice myself. I've had years. My infant hasn't.

What mother, who has carried an infant in her womb for months, given that situation, selfishly chooses herself?

(04-16-2015 10:54 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  ERC, if your wife was pregnant with a 7 pound baby and the doctors told you that your wife would die during child birth, would you want the government to make the decision on whose life to save, or would you want to make that decision yourself in consultation with your doctor?

The democratic position is that it should be made by the family and the doctor.

Your continual assertion that anyone in favor of abortion rights supports murder and/or that it means nothing to them is disgusting and highly offensive.

The truth is disgusting and offensive because you can infer from Waserman-Schultz not arguing against aborting a 7 lb baby that she does support the CHOICE to kill a 7 lb baby.

Highly offensive....that's hilarious.

Killing a 7 pound baby means nothing to Dems. They are butchers. They want to deny it, but that witch Wasserman proved it in that video. We will all face judgment one day.

For me...She does at least ask a question that I think Rand needs to answer. What about Rape, Incest and medical necessity?

Cue the "pro-choicers" with their anecdotal accounts that happen about in 1% of abortion cases.

(04-16-2015 11:11 AM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 10:56 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 10:51 AM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  So we all have this straight, we can infer from the DNC Party Chair: Infanticide is a plank in the DNC Party Platform. Got it.

What is your answer to my question?

BTW I am a woman.

In that instance, I can unequivocally say that 'd save the baby and sacrifice myself. I've had years. My infant hasn't.

What mother, who has carried an infant in her womb for months, given that situation, selfishly chooses herself?

this world needs more people like you.

(04-16-2015 10:56 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 10:51 AM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  So we all have this straight, we can infer from the DNC Party Chair: Infanticide is a plank in the DNC Party Platform. Got it.

What is your answer to my question?

My answer is That's why They have C Section Births. to Safely deliver the Baby alive. The baby has to come out whether The Dr. Kills it first by Abortion or It's delivered Vaginaly or by C section. If at this stage the Mother dosen't want the Child, Give it up for adoption.

(04-16-2015 11:11 AM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 10:56 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 10:51 AM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  So we all have this straight, we can infer from the DNC Party Chair: Infanticide is a plank in the DNC Party Platform. Got it.

What is your answer to my question?

BTW I am a woman.

In that instance, I can unequivocally say that 'd save the baby and sacrifice myself. I've had years. My infant hasn't.

What mother, who has carried an infant in her womb for months, given that situation, selfishly chooses herself?

I would venture to say many given the number of women that get abortions because having a baby would be "inconvenient".

(04-16-2015 11:38 AM)blunderbuss Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 11:11 AM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 10:56 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-16-2015 10:51 AM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  So we all have this straight, we can infer from the DNC Party Chair: Infanticide is a plank in the DNC Party Platform. Got it.

What is your answer to my question?

BTW I am a woman.

In that instance, I can unequivocally say that 'd save the baby and sacrifice myself. I've had years. My infant hasn't.

What mother, who has carried an infant in her womb for months, given that situation, selfishly chooses herself?

this world needs more people like you.

Indeed.

"In that instance, I can unequivocally say that 'd save the baby and sacrifice myself. I've had years. My infant hasn't. "


Yeah, I'm not seeing D's putting the force of govt. behind your choice. If you want to sacrifice yourself for another that is your choice. I don't understand how you can make this choice so freely for others though. The other part of this is that what if the 7 pound baby was doomed? What if it had chromosomal abnormalities that wouldn't allow it to survive? Are you that twisted that you can not give someone else the choice of mercy because of a political ideology? If you want to carry a child that has 0% chance of viability. Go on ahead. No one is stopping you. HOW ON EARTH YOU CAN SIT IN JUDGEMENT ON OTHERS IS BEYOND MY COMPREHENSION! I don't understand you. It's cruel.


Then take the other side of it. It doesn't take Nostradamus to figure out some of the ramifications of forcing children to be born to neglectful parents. Forcing. It's a recipe for disaster.

Nothing good is going to happen in this thread. It is destined to be closed by the mods.

(04-16-2015 11:43 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  "In that instance, I can unequivocally say that 'd save the baby and sacrifice myself. I've had years. My infant hasn't. "


Yeah, I'm not seeing D's putting the force of govt. behind your choice. If you want to sacrifice yourself for another that is your choice. I don't understand how you can make this choice so freely for others though. The other part of this is that what if the 7 pound baby was doomed? What if it had chromosomal abnormalities that wouldn't allow it to survive? Are you that twisted that you can not give someone else the choice of mercy because of a political ideology? If you want to carry a child that has 0% chance of viability. Go on ahead. No one is stopping you. HOW ON EARTH YOU CAN SIT IN JUDGEMENT ON OTHERS IS BEYOND MY COMPREHENSION! I don't understand you. It's cruel.


Then take the other side of it. It doesn't take Nostradamus to figure out some of the ramifications of forcing children to be born to neglectful parents. Forcing. It's a recipe for disaster.

ok. so you are basically talking about something that rarely happens. So if in the law, you can write in that if the mothers life is at risk, she can do a late abortion.

However, if no health risks present, what is your opinion on aborting a 7lb baby?

classic political non-answer by woman pictured. I agree that it is a choice between a woman and her doctor, but there has to be some restrictions on the practice.

(04-16-2015 11:54 AM)fsquid Wrote:  I agree that it is a choice between a woman and her doctor, but there has to be some restrictions on the practice.

That's pretty much how I feel.