(02-07-2017 10:50 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(02-07-2017 10:22 AM)DexterDevil Wrote:  

(02-07-2017 08:35 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(02-07-2017 01:14 AM)DexterDevil Wrote:  

(02-07-2017 01:03 AM)TomorrowHerd Wrote:  Not enough penicillin or acyclovir in the world to let me hit 99.9% of the people in hollywood or music these days.
Mariah Carey on the other hand...

Emma Watson would be the one for me.

Emma likely refuses any position that deems to be "objectifies women", so you're stuck only doing missionary (although now that I think of it she is probably cool with being on top as she is in control, but forget about having her go reverse cowgirl).

I'd be completely willing to give control to her, I wouldn't even need to have sex, her beauty would be more than enough for me. As weird as that is.

If we are talking a one night romp in the hay-- maybe, but a woman like that is not relationship material. As the old saying goes, "No matter how beautiful she is, somewhere some other guy is tired of her sh*".

Unfortunately that old saying is probably right in most cases, specially in this one cause I do not get along with feminists in the least bit, it would be nothing but arguing.

(02-07-2017 11:18 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(02-07-2017 10:58 AM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(02-07-2017 10:17 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

Leave it to Trump supporters to believe even the Super Bowl was fixed.

Duh, MLS is fixed to, it's all bullsh*t.