Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Interview with Mike Aresco
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
MWC Tex Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,240
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 123
I Root For: MW
Location: TX
Post: #21
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
By the way, the SunBelt and SEC have a coordination with refs as well as the MW and Pac 12. Don't read to much into it.
03-08-2018 08:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HuskyU Offline
The Peoples' P6 Champion
*

Posts: 14,215
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 663
I Root For: A Bowl Game
Location: 4 > 1
Post: #22
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-08-2018 07:36 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 03:25 AM)Agust Wrote:  
(03-07-2018 09:47 PM)BigHouston Wrote:  
(03-07-2018 09:23 PM)geosnooker2000 Wrote:  
(03-07-2018 09:09 PM)BigHouston Wrote:  "talks with another league about starting something."

Football, please let it be The PAC...

IDK... do we really want that kind of travel? How about the BigX.

I think you already know the answear to that ^^^

The B12 would be nice for football and basketball... It would gives us all here in Houston a chance to remind them BONGhorns who the real football kings are... Hehe

I think the Big12 wants to avoid the AAC after the media fiasco and their crap talk with their ADs and The Texas Tech doofus who said UCF wasn't a good team. Either way hook the Big12 I rather do something with the SEC or PAC12.

But, I wonder what the need for working with another league on officiating brings. Does anybody know?

Reduction in overhead and improved quality. IMO the only two conferences that make sense would be either the BXII or C-USA due to location of officials and conference HQ (I realize the AAC has not moved to Dallas yet).

I realize many would be up in arms if it is C-USA but it does make some sense from a financial and quality standpoint. Adding the best of their crew to ours lifts all boats. As it currently stands we get some bad officiating on Saturdays in the fall because of the number of games and the lack of depth in good officials.

I think the cost side of thing needs little explanation.

It's not CUSA. Aresco said in the podcast that they were talking with another power conference because they have better resources.
03-08-2018 08:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SMUmustangs Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,108
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 68
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #23
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-08-2018 08:42 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 07:36 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 03:25 AM)Agust Wrote:  
(03-07-2018 09:47 PM)BigHouston Wrote:  
(03-07-2018 09:23 PM)geosnooker2000 Wrote:  IDK... do we really want that kind of travel? How about the BigX.

I think you already know the answear to that ^^^

The B12 would be nice for football and basketball... It would gives us all here in Houston a chance to remind them BONGhorns who the real football kings are... Hehe

I think the Big12 wants to avoid the AAC after the media fiasco and their crap talk with their ADs and The Texas Tech doofus who said UCF wasn't a good team. Either way hook the Big12 I rather do something with the SEC or PAC12.

But, I wonder what the need for working with another league on officiating brings. Does anybody know?

Reduction in overhead and improved quality. IMO the only two conferences that make sense would be either the BXII or C-USA due to location of officials and conference HQ (I realize the AAC has not moved to Dallas yet).

I realize many would be up in arms if it is C-USA but it does make some sense from a financial and quality standpoint. Adding the best of their crew to ours lifts all boats. As it currently stands we get some bad officiating on Saturdays in the fall because of the number of games and the lack of depth in good officials.

I think the cost side of thing needs little explanation.

It's not CUSA. Aresco said in the podcast that they were talking with another power conference because they have better resources.

You must have listened to a different podcast. I played the podcast twice and I did not hear him say they were talking with another power conference.
03-08-2018 10:27 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
billybobby777 Offline
Fighting the cartel 5
*

Posts: 9,538
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 351
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
Post: #24
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-08-2018 10:27 AM)SMUmustangs Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 08:42 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 07:36 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 03:25 AM)Agust Wrote:  
(03-07-2018 09:47 PM)BigHouston Wrote:  I think you already know the answear to that ^^^

The B12 would be nice for football and basketball... It would gives us all here in Houston a chance to remind them BONGhorns who the real football kings are... Hehe

I think the Big12 wants to avoid the AAC after the media fiasco and their crap talk with their ADs and The Texas Tech doofus who said UCF wasn't a good team. Either way hook the Big12 I rather do something with the SEC or PAC12.

But, I wonder what the need for working with another league on officiating brings. Does anybody know?

Reduction in overhead and improved quality. IMO the only two conferences that make sense would be either the BXII or C-USA due to location of officials and conference HQ (I realize the AAC has not moved to Dallas yet).

I realize many would be up in arms if it is C-USA but it does make some sense from a financial and quality standpoint. Adding the best of their crew to ours lifts all boats. As it currently stands we get some bad officiating on Saturdays in the fall because of the number of games and the lack of depth in good officials.

I think the cost side of thing needs little explanation.

It's not CUSA. Aresco said in the podcast that they were talking with another power conference because they have better resources.

You must have listened to a different podcast. I played the podcast twice and I did not hear him say they were talking with another power conference.

I didn’t hear that either. It’s been posted on this thread a couple times but I didn’t hear it on the interview.
What time in the interview is it said?
03-08-2018 10:41 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
pablowow Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,139
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation: 31
I Root For: TULANE/AAC
Location: Louisiana
Post: #25
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-08-2018 10:41 AM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 10:27 AM)SMUmustangs Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 08:42 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 07:36 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 03:25 AM)Agust Wrote:  I think the Big12 wants to avoid the AAC after the media fiasco and their crap talk with their ADs and The Texas Tech doofus who said UCF wasn't a good team. Either way hook the Big12 I rather do something with the SEC or PAC12.

But, I wonder what the need for working with another league on officiating brings. Does anybody know?

Reduction in overhead and improved quality. IMO the only two conferences that make sense would be either the BXII or C-USA due to location of officials and conference HQ (I realize the AAC has not moved to Dallas yet).

I realize many would be up in arms if it is C-USA but it does make some sense from a financial and quality standpoint. Adding the best of their crew to ours lifts all boats. As it currently stands we get some bad officiating on Saturdays in the fall because of the number of games and the lack of depth in good officials.

I think the cost side of thing needs little explanation.

It's not CUSA. Aresco said in the podcast that they were talking with another power conference because they have better resources.

You must have listened to a different podcast. I played the podcast twice and I did not hear him say they were talking with another power conference.

I didn’t hear that either. It’s been posted on this thread a couple times but I didn’t hear it on the interview.
What time in the interview is it said?

Sounds like big 10....
03-08-2018 11:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
billybobby777 Offline
Fighting the cartel 5
*

Posts: 9,538
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 351
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
Post: #26
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-08-2018 11:12 AM)pablowow Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 10:41 AM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 10:27 AM)SMUmustangs Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 08:42 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 07:36 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  Reduction in overhead and improved quality. IMO the only two conferences that make sense would be either the BXII or C-USA due to location of officials and conference HQ (I realize the AAC has not moved to Dallas yet).

I realize many would be up in arms if it is C-USA but it does make some sense from a financial and quality standpoint. Adding the best of their crew to ours lifts all boats. As it currently stands we get some bad officiating on Saturdays in the fall because of the number of games and the lack of depth in good officials.

I think the cost side of thing needs little explanation.

It's not CUSA. Aresco said in the podcast that they were talking with another power conference because they have better resources.

You must have listened to a different podcast. I played the podcast twice and I did not hear him say they were talking with another power conference.

I didn’t hear that either. It’s been posted on this thread a couple times but I didn’t hear it on the interview.
What time in the interview is it said?

Sounds like big 10....

Again, based on what?
03-08-2018 11:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SMUmustangs Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,108
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 68
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #27
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-08-2018 10:41 AM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 10:27 AM)SMUmustangs Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 08:42 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 07:36 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 03:25 AM)Agust Wrote:  I think the Big12 wants to avoid the AAC after the media fiasco and their crap talk with their ADs and The Texas Tech doofus who said UCF wasn't a good team. Either way hook the Big12 I rather do something with the SEC or PAC12.

But, I wonder what the need for working with another league on officiating brings. Does anybody know?

Reduction in overhead and improved quality. IMO the only two conferences that make sense would be either the BXII or C-USA due to location of officials and conference HQ (I realize the AAC has not moved to Dallas yet).

I realize many would be up in arms if it is C-USA but it does make some sense from a financial and quality standpoint. Adding the best of their crew to ours lifts all boats. As it currently stands we get some bad officiating on Saturdays in the fall because of the number of games and the lack of depth in good officials.

I think the cost side of thing needs little explanation.

It's not CUSA. Aresco said in the podcast that they were talking with another power conference because they have better resources.

You must have listened to a different podcast. I played the podcast twice and I did not hear him say they were talking with another power conference.

I didn’t hear that either. It’s been posted on this thread a couple times but I didn’t hear it on the interview.
What time in the interview is it said?

About the 15:00 minute mark. Start listening at about 14:30. He distinctly says .....talking with ANOTHER conference
(This post was last modified: 03-08-2018 11:27 AM by SMUmustangs.)
03-08-2018 11:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ultraviolet Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,990
Joined: Jan 2004
Reputation: 136
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #28
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-07-2018 10:17 PM)BullsFanInTX Wrote:  Defended the AAC very well when asked about that idiot from NIU's comments.

That Northern Iowa idiot should be forced to listen to it over and over for a week.
03-08-2018 11:40 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ultraviolet Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,990
Joined: Jan 2004
Reputation: 136
I Root For: ECU
Location:
Post: #29
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-07-2018 11:17 PM)fishpro1098 Wrote:  
(03-07-2018 10:48 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(03-07-2018 10:43 PM)Wheatshock Wrote:  
(03-07-2018 10:21 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(03-07-2018 09:34 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  Yup. And he wants to start that with a Power league because they have better resources.

So who and what?
Big 12 referees?

Wasn't the SEC trying out centralized replay this year?

Even though they seem like the least likely conference to work with us their footprint and ours do overlap to a significant extent so pooling resources makes some sense.

SEC refs will love going to Uconn and Temple

North Philly will toughen them up a little.

My sister got her PhD at Temple. got mugged on her way to school one day. My old Army buddy was a professor there (since moved to Drexel) heard glass breaking in his town home kitchen. He came down to find a hand reaching through the window over his sink. He stabbed it with a knife he'd been given by a former counterpart in Russia. Whoever it was left. Gentrification of North Philly can't come soon enough.
03-08-2018 11:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Agust Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 237
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 17
I Root For: American
Location:
Post: #30
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-08-2018 11:18 AM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 11:12 AM)pablowow Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 10:41 AM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 10:27 AM)SMUmustangs Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 08:42 AM)HuskyU Wrote:  It's not CUSA. Aresco said in the podcast that they were talking with another power conference because they have better resources.

You must have listened to a different podcast. I played the podcast twice and I did not hear him say they were talking with another power conference.

I didn’t hear that either. It’s been posted on this thread a couple times but I didn’t hear it on the interview.
What time in the interview is it said?

Sounds like big 10....

Again, based on what?

I'm the interview he didn't mention a conference but the whole attitude was that that he is pushing towards scheduling against P5 and trying to distance himself from the rest of the G5. This fits more in line with what he's trying to do. There is a market for AAC games and scheduling as discussed in the interview.
03-08-2018 12:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SMUmustangs Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,108
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 68
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #31
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-08-2018 12:30 PM)Agust Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 11:18 AM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 11:12 AM)pablowow Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 10:41 AM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 10:27 AM)SMUmustangs Wrote:  You must have listened to a different podcast. I played the podcast twice and I did not hear him say they were talking with another power conference.

I didn’t hear that either. It’s been posted on this thread a couple times but I didn’t hear it on the interview.
What time in the interview is it said?

Sounds like big 10....

Again, based on what?

I'm the interview he didn't mention a conference but the whole attitude was that that he is pushing towards scheduling against P5 and trying to distance himself from the rest of the G5. This fits more in line with what he's trying to do. There is a market for AAC games and scheduling as discussed in the interview.

How does that lead you to believe the Big10 is involved?
03-08-2018 02:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
pablowow Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,139
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation: 31
I Root For: TULANE/AAC
Location: Louisiana
Post: #32
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-08-2018 02:37 PM)SMUmustangs Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 12:30 PM)Agust Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 11:18 AM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 11:12 AM)pablowow Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 10:41 AM)billybobby777 Wrote:  I didn’t hear that either. It’s been posted on this thread a couple times but I didn’t hear it on the interview.
What time in the interview is it said?

Sounds like big 10....

Again, based on what?

I'm the interview he didn't mention a conference but the whole attitude was that that he is pushing towards scheduling against P5 and trying to distance himself from the rest of the G5. This fits more in line with what he's trying to do. There is a market for AAC games and scheduling as discussed in the interview.

How does that lead you to believe the Big10 is involved?

Totally just my feeling based on our geography and his goals for the big 10
03-08-2018 02:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
pablowow Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,139
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation: 31
I Root For: TULANE/AAC
Location: Louisiana
Post: #33
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-08-2018 02:40 PM)pablowow Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 02:37 PM)SMUmustangs Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 12:30 PM)Agust Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 11:18 AM)billybobby777 Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 11:12 AM)pablowow Wrote:  Sounds like big 10....

Again, based on what?

I'm the interview he didn't mention a conference but the whole attitude was that that he is pushing towards scheduling against P5 and trying to distance himself from the rest of the G5. This fits more in line with what he's trying to do. There is a market for AAC games and scheduling as discussed in the interview.

How does that lead you to believe the Big10 is involved?

Totally just my feeling based on our geography and his goals for the big 10

Thinking about them trying to gain tv viewers and opponents in the eastern markets.. ACC and SEC already have the market being shared and big ten can get more home games from AAC and influence recruits...
03-08-2018 02:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SMUmustangs Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,108
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 68
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #34
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-08-2018 02:48 PM)pablowow Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 02:40 PM)pablowow Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 02:37 PM)SMUmustangs Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 12:30 PM)Agust Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 11:18 AM)billybobby777 Wrote:  Again, based on what?

I'm the interview he didn't mention a conference but the whole attitude was that that he is pushing towards scheduling against P5 and trying to distance himself from the rest of the G5. This fits more in line with what he's trying to do. There is a market for AAC games and scheduling as discussed in the interview.

How does that lead you to believe the Big10 is involved?

Totally just my feeling based on our geography and his goals for the big 10

Thinking about them trying to gain tv viewers and opponents in the eastern markets.. ACC and SEC already have the market being shared and big ten can get more home games from AAC and influence recruits...

Don't know what goals Aresco has for the Big10 that you are talking about. Also, it was my understanding that Aresco was only talking about a consortium for sharing officials, centralized replay etc.

I think you are stretching things to the extreme.
03-08-2018 03:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
slhNavy91 Online
1st String
*

Posts: 1,679
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 178
I Root For: Navy
Location:
Post: #35
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-08-2018 03:26 PM)SMUmustangs Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 02:48 PM)pablowow Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 02:40 PM)pablowow Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 02:37 PM)SMUmustangs Wrote:  
(03-08-2018 12:30 PM)Agust Wrote:  I'm the interview he didn't mention a conference but the whole attitude was that that he is pushing towards scheduling against P5 and trying to distance himself from the rest of the G5. This fits more in line with what he's trying to do. There is a market for AAC games and scheduling as discussed in the interview.

How does that lead you to believe the Big10 is involved?

Totally just my feeling based on our geography and his goals for the big 10

Thinking about them trying to gain tv viewers and opponents in the eastern markets.. ACC and SEC already have the market being shared and big ten can get more home games from AAC and influence recruits...

Don't know what goals Aresco has for the Big10 that you are talking about. Also, it was my understanding that Aresco was only talking about a consortium for sharing officials, centralized replay etc.

I think you are stretching things to the extreme.

Yeah. Post #27 here tells the time of the podcast to go back and listen. In that section/response he talks about the consoritum, and choosing another P6 to work with because of resources, then broadens scope to talk about strengthening ties with other P6s. Here is where he digresses to talk of scheduling other P6s, but circles back to officiating after that -- the bits about scheduling, P6 ties, are part and parcel of the response to the officiating/replay consortium. (and then post #18 includes a different answer than big10)
(This post was last modified: 03-08-2018 05:09 PM by slhNavy91.)
03-08-2018 04:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gulfcoastgal Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,458
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 151
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location:
Post: #36
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
I haven't listened to the podcast yet, but didn't Aresco recently mention the B1G recognizing the AAC as a quasi power team regarding scheduling...which could just reference the few previously singled out or maybe something more... That's where my mind first went anyway.
03-09-2018 07:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mlb Offline
O' Great One
*

Posts: 17,228
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 229
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:

Donators
Post: #37
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
B1G said UC, UConn, and BYU were considered power teams for scheduling purposes.
03-09-2018 08:19 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
gulfcoastgal Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,458
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 151
I Root For: Memphis Tigers
Location:
Post: #38
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-09-2018 08:19 AM)mlb Wrote:  B1G said UC, UConn, and BYU were considered power teams for scheduling purposes.

Right, those scheduled games would count and others could as well on a case by case review. It was left open ended.

ETA: http://www.fbschedules.com/2015/09/big-t...opponents/

Quote:Last week, it was reported by the Indianapolis Star that Indiana had been granted an exception to count Cincinnati and UConn as Power Five teams for scheduling purposes.

The Hoosiers already have future home-and-home series set up against both Cincinnati and UConn, which dates back to last year. IU and Cincinnati are set for 2021 and 2022, while the Hoosiers will take on UConn in 2019 and 2020.

According to Big Ten senior associate commissioner Mark Rudner, more Group of Five teams could be included.

“We looked at their RPI for the last five or six years,” Rudner told the Star’s Mark Alesia. “If someone comes to us with a request, we’ll evaluate it. That’s what happened with these two. Those seemed to fit.”

Today we learned of two more schools, one Independent and one from the American Athletic Conference, that will supposedly count towards the Big Ten’s scheduling requirement. Those two teams are Army and Navy, per Brett McMurphy of ESPN.com.
(This post was last modified: 03-09-2018 08:52 AM by gulfcoastgal.)
03-09-2018 08:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SHOCK_value Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 331
Joined: Apr 2017
Reputation: 31
I Root For: Wichita State
Location:
Post: #39
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
(03-07-2018 09:09 PM)BigHouston Wrote:  ...for Basketball I have no clue who it could be... But 100% total failure if is with one of the G4's 03-puke

The MWC can't suck forever. They're just a few years removed for being a very strong basketball league. Plus, they actually have fan bases and media followings.
03-09-2018 12:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 25,504
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 1073
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #40
RE: Interview with Mike Aresco
A little more detail on the officiating changes Aresco mentioned.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nc...410989002/
03-09-2018 03:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2018 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2018 MyBB Group.