Is USF now the first team in college football history to have a seven-game winning streak and a six-game losing streak in the same season?

(12-21-2018 07:19 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Is USF now the first team in college football history to have a seven-game winning streak and a six-game losing streak in the same season?

Miami (Ohio) almost did the opposite in 2016, but they lose their bowl

(12-21-2018 07:56 AM)Gamecock Wrote:  

(12-21-2018 07:19 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Is USF now the first team in college football history to have a seven-game winning streak and a six-game losing streak in the same season?

Miami (Ohio) almost did the opposite in 2016, but they lose their bowl

That’s right. Not to long ago.

(12-21-2018 03:02 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  And they said that AAC with USF are the P6 conference when you lose to a C-USA team that was supposed to be weaker than the AAC?

You should not cast stones. You were one of these people on the board bragging all season about how great the MWC was. Your MWC had a team lose to a team from the MAC.

(12-21-2018 03:02 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  And they said that AAC with USF are the P6 conference when you lose to a C-USA team that was supposed to be weaker than the AAC?

The AAC is obviously not a Power league on the field. As Coog and others have said, P6 is just marketing

(12-21-2018 08:15 AM)MWC Tex Wrote:  

(12-21-2018 07:56 AM)Gamecock Wrote:  

(12-21-2018 07:19 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  Is USF now the first team in college football history to have a seven-game winning streak and a six-game losing streak in the same season?

Miami (Ohio) almost did the opposite in 2016, but they lose their bowl

That’s right. Not to long ago.

Don't remind me about that debacle against Mississippi State. But we played that in St. Pete too funny enough, I guess it's where dreams go to die and history is up for grabs.

(12-20-2018 11:32 PM)esayem Wrote:  

(12-20-2018 11:26 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  Bulls ended up as a huge dude at the end of the season. Disappointing

Dude where's their bus?

Spell check....dud

Announced crowd of 14,135. No way they had that many people at RJS. Thought USF would have had strong contingent of fans, since it was essentially an added home game.

(12-21-2018 03:02 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  And they said that AAC with USF are the P6 conference when you lose to a C-USA team that was supposed to be weaker than the AAC?

You say that like Marshall isn't traditionally one of the strongest G5 football programs in the last quarter century. In fact, no team wearing an AAC logo on their uniform has ever defeated Marshall. Marshall now has last game scoreboard on EVERY AAC football school (and Wichita State in last year's NCAA MBB Tournament for their basketball-only member) except for UCF who haven't played since leaving C-USA.

It looks like if the AAC will ever break this stream, UCF will have to up their schedule and play Marshall again...

(12-21-2018 10:31 AM)GoldenWarrior11 Wrote:  Announced crowd of 14,135. No way they had that many people at RJS. Thought USF would have had strong contingent of fans, since it was essentially an added home game.

It looks like all those people could have fit in lower level seats between the 30 yard lines. Did all those fans want to have lousy views, or were the organizers just being hard-***** by making them sit in the seats they bought on line?

(12-21-2018 10:31 AM)GoldenWarrior11 Wrote:  Announced crowd of 14,135. No way they had that many people at RJS. Thought USF would have had strong contingent of fans, since it was essentially an added home game.

Was basically played in a monsoon on a weeknight so that certainly depressed attendance. Had it been a sunny Saturday you'd see a different story, I'm also guessing that the USF fan base wasn't very excited coming off a blowout loss to UCF and five-game losing streak.

Weather was obviously a factor but 14K announced is sad. We all know that is the sold/distributed total. Anyone know what each team's allotment was? 5000?

Is that the real name of a bowl?

(12-20-2018 07:32 PM)Love and Honor Wrote:  Still pissed that when Miami played in this bowl that (1) it was in Trop when it was beautiful outside, (2) I lived fifteen minutes away from Raymond James Stadium at the time and instead had to schlep across the bay, (3) it was the day after Christmas, and (4) the bowl still had the lame name instead of the wonderfully zany one it has today.

You can have the outdoor 90+ heat and rainstorms, I'll take the Trop. Either way there needs to be light rail across the bay.

(12-21-2018 10:43 AM)CoachMaclid Wrote:  

(12-21-2018 03:02 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  And they said that AAC with USF are the P6 conference when you lose to a C-USA team that was supposed to be weaker than the AAC?

You say that like Marshall isn't traditionally one of the strongest G5 football programs in the last quarter century. In fact, no team wearing an AAC logo on their uniform has ever defeated Marshall. Marshall now has last game scoreboard on EVERY AAC football school (and Wichita State in last year's NCAA MBB Tournament for their basketball-only member) except for UCF who haven't played since leaving C-USA.

It looks like if the AAC will ever break this stream, UCF will have to up their schedule and play Marshall again...

lol...you do, of course, realize that USF finished in 8th place in the AAC. They actually were just 3-5 in AAC conference play.

(12-21-2018 01:19 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(12-21-2018 10:43 AM)CoachMaclid Wrote:  

(12-21-2018 03:02 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  And they said that AAC with USF are the P6 conference when you lose to a C-USA team that was supposed to be weaker than the AAC?

You say that like Marshall isn't traditionally one of the strongest G5 football programs in the last quarter century. In fact, no team wearing an AAC logo on their uniform has ever defeated Marshall. Marshall now has last game scoreboard on EVERY AAC football school (and Wichita State in last year's NCAA MBB Tournament for their basketball-only member) except for UCF who haven't played since leaving C-USA.

It looks like if the AAC will ever break this stream, UCF will have to up their schedule and play Marshall again...

lol...you do, of course, realize that USF finished in 8th place in the AAC. They actually were just 3-5 in AAC conference play.

I assume this means that no AAC fan will ever again mention or celebrate beating any P5 team in the bottom half of its conference. Right?

(12-21-2018 12:53 PM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  

(12-20-2018 07:32 PM)Love and Honor Wrote:  Still pissed that when Miami played in this bowl that (1) it was in Trop when it was beautiful outside, (2) I lived fifteen minutes away from Raymond James Stadium at the time and instead had to schlep across the bay, (3) it was the day after Christmas, and (4) the bowl still had the lame name instead of the wonderfully zany one it has today.

You can have the outdoor 90+ heat and rainstorms, I'll take the Trop. Either way there needs to be light rail across the bay.

In the summer and early fall sure, afternoon thunderstorms and armpit humidity are a given. But in December or January? Most the time it'll be alright outside. And light rail across the bay would be a boondoggle, just expand that Tampa to St. Pete ferry that started a few years back.

(12-21-2018 01:19 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(12-21-2018 10:43 AM)CoachMaclid Wrote:  

(12-21-2018 03:02 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  And they said that AAC with USF are the P6 conference when you lose to a C-USA team that was supposed to be weaker than the AAC?

You say that like Marshall isn't traditionally one of the strongest G5 football programs in the last quarter century. In fact, no team wearing an AAC logo on their uniform has ever defeated Marshall. Marshall now has last game scoreboard on EVERY AAC football school (and Wichita State in last year's NCAA MBB Tournament for their basketball-only member) except for UCF who haven't played since leaving C-USA.

It looks like if the AAC will ever break this stream, UCF will have to up their schedule and play Marshall again...

lol...you do, of course, realize that USF finished in 8th place in the AAC. They actually were just 3-5 in AAC conference play.

Houston lost their last football game against Marshall, too.

Maybe your league shouldn't continuously let undeserving teams get winning records.

(12-21-2018 01:39 PM)Wedge Wrote:  

(12-21-2018 01:19 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(12-21-2018 10:43 AM)CoachMaclid Wrote:  

(12-21-2018 03:02 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  And they said that AAC with USF are the P6 conference when you lose to a C-USA team that was supposed to be weaker than the AAC?

You say that like Marshall isn't traditionally one of the strongest G5 football programs in the last quarter century. In fact, no team wearing an AAC logo on their uniform has ever defeated Marshall. Marshall now has last game scoreboard on EVERY AAC football school (and Wichita State in last year's NCAA MBB Tournament for their basketball-only member) except for UCF who haven't played since leaving C-USA.

It looks like if the AAC will ever break this stream, UCF will have to up their schedule and play Marshall again...

lol...you do, of course, realize that USF finished in 8th place in the AAC. They actually were just 3-5 in AAC conference play.

I assume this means that no AAC fan will ever again mention or celebrate beating any P5 team in the bottom half of its conference. Right?

Sounds like you're saying the gap between the G4 conferences and the AAC is the same as the gap between the AAC and the five contract-bowl-conferences...which is what P6 is all about (yes even "tweener" supports the P6 campaign).

(12-21-2018 08:31 AM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(12-21-2018 03:02 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  And they said that AAC with USF are the P6 conference when you lose to a C-USA team that was supposed to be weaker than the AAC?

You should not cast stones. You were one of these people on the board bragging all season about how great the MWC was. Your MWC had a team lose to a team from the MAC.

Arkansas Tech is the MWC?