(01-24-2023 01:11 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: (01-24-2023 12:40 PM)Gamenole Wrote: (01-24-2023 12:32 PM)UofMstateU Wrote: Imagine that.
Yet, we've only had a single person to be raided. (And that person was someone who absolutely had legal authority to have these documents in his possession.)
(01-24-2023 12:34 PM)VA49er Wrote: Just goes to show lots of the political elite have classified docs where they shouldn't. Not saying it's not a big deal, but it does prove the Trump inquisition was pure political partisanship, and nothing more.
Trump had documents NARA knew were missing from their custody and requested back...with incomplete success and sporadic cooperation from Trump and his staff. Pence & Biden found things that NARA didn't know they were missing and hadn't asked for, and appear to be turning them over immediately and cooperating fully. Therein lies entirely the reason that we have only one "raid" between the three men.
Total bullcrap. The Feds were told they could take any documents they wanted (and they took some) in June.
And when the same people were told that at MaL, they asked to view inside the boxes in the basement. And Trump refused that.
And you misstate the sequence of events.
Trump sonsistently told the feds and NARA that no more documents marked as classifeid existed. Then the subpoeana came down. Then more trump obstruction.
Finally Trump team says to the Feds -- we have some. The feds rolled down to get that small folder of them. Trump didnt kindly turn them over -- he turned them over only at the requirement of what the subpoena required him to do at that point.
Trump braggadociously told them 'we will help you in any way.'
At that meeting in MaL for the turnover, the feds then responded to his offer by asking to look inside the boxes. Which he abjectly refused.
Please get the details and timing correct.
Quote:The idea there was no cooperation is totally made up left wing fan fiction.
I call the above a severe lack of cooperation. When one makes a sworn statement at that time, and it turns out to be false -- one would call the level of cooperation very close to none.
What do *you* call making a false statement under oath about the matter?
Quote: There were area disagreements---but thats not evidence of non-cooperation---thats simply a debate as to certain documents which the president considered personal. Again---any presidents home would likely yield government documents. Its that simple.
Doesnt matter. They are government documents. Give them back. Its that simple.
When subpoenaed for them -- again, give them back. Its that simple.
Dont make a false statement under oath regarding them -- its that simple.
Quote:The DOJ knew that---which was why it was a perfect snare to "get Trump". The problem is criminalizing this will work to undermine virtually any politician with access to documents.....and now everyone is finally figuring that out.
Trump ensnared himself by refusing to give back documents he had no right to possess. refusing after requests, refusing after subpoena, and by submitting a flase statement under oath about it.
ANd somehow Trump is 'ensnared' after that active explict action? Seriously?
No one pointed a gun at Trumps head and said 'dont give back the "government's" documents' (mind you, you admitted the documents are the government's above in the bolded...)
No one pointed a gun at Trumps head and said 'blow off the subpoena for the "government's" documents'.
No one pointed a gun at Trumps head and said 'make a false statement under oath about your possession and control of the "government's" documents'.
So cut it with the 'ensnared' stuff, the 'poor Trump got sandbagged' load. Trump did Trump.