Headline:
How much of a problem is the new AAC for Memphis? We’re starting to find out
Author:
Mark Giannotto of the Commerical Appeal (Memphis)
Highlights:
1. The effects of the AAC departures is "starting to show'
2. Effect 1 - After Tulane, the remaining AAC games are against opponents with 14-20 records.
3. Effect 2 - The basketball Tigers' have a tough OOC schedule because they know only a few AAC games help their NCAA tourney resume.
4. Effect 3 - The former CUSA6 are as bad as originally feared in FB and BB - FAU BB excepted. Last season, seven AAC schools finished in the top half of the FB Power Index. This season only SMU, Memphis, and Tulane qualify. Not a single former CUSA6 school presently have a winning record.
5. Effect 4 - NIL issues.
6. Effect 5 - Expanding west would have been in the best interest of the Tigers; especially with SMU's pending departure.
7. Effect 6 - Tiger fans and boosters are apathetic and weary.
8. Unlike the past six years, the best AAC school is not assured of a berth in the NY6. In other words, an unblemished Tiger record (save Missouri) may not be good enough. The MWC and SBC have not improved - the issue is the AAC has deteriorated. However, the author points out first year transitions can be difficult (cites UCF, Cincy, and Houston).
9. Other than FAU, the present AAC looks a lot like the old CUSA in basketball.
10. The weakened AAC creates a perception which may be difficult to overcome in the eyes of the CFP committee members.
11. The present AAC "makes it harder than ever" to show (in Penny's words) " we (the AAC) can play with … anybody in this country."
https://www.commercialappeal.com/story/s...126466007/