UCGrad1992
Legend
Posts: 31,951
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation: 2312
I Root For: Bearcats U
Location: North Carolina
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
(12-24-2023 06:51 PM)BullsFanInTX Wrote: USF, Tulane, and UConn seem like the most logical choices. Also, try to peel off Cincinnati, UCF, or West Virginia from the Big 12.
No one is peeling off from the B12 to join a watered down ACC. FSU won't be the only team leaving...
|
|
12-24-2023 07:06 PM |
|
bryanw1995
+12 Hackmaster
Posts: 13,403
Joined: Jul 2022
Reputation: 1408
I Root For: A&M
Location: San Antonio
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
I voted Memphis, they’re ready to go day 1 and they bring a new and very enthusiastic market. USF is 2nd just bc they’re a reasonable Florida backfill.
|
|
12-24-2023 07:09 PM |
|
Utgrizfan
Special Teams
Posts: 601
Joined: Sep 2021
Reputation: 46
I Root For: Utah, Army, Montana
Location: Utah
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
(12-24-2023 07:06 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote: (12-24-2023 06:51 PM)BullsFanInTX Wrote: USF, Tulane, and UConn seem like the most logical choices. Also, try to peel off Cincinnati, UCF, or West Virginia from the Big 12.
No one is peeling off from the B12 to join a watered down ACC. FSU won't be the only team leaving...
Minimum of 4 to a maximum of 6 will be joining the Big10 and/or SEC
|
|
12-24-2023 07:12 PM |
|
Pervis_Griffith
All American
Posts: 2,932
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 364
I Root For: Louisville
Location:
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
If the ACC's Grant of Rights get pierced, then anyone's Grant of Rights can be pierced.
Big XII schools will definitely be poachable, and I see that as more likely than not.
The new ACC will be flush with exit fees .... and the price to get out will have been established. FSU is saying that's almost $600 million dollars. NONE of the schools tabbed for the Big XII will spend that kind of coin to go make the same money they're making now.
WVU
Cincy
UCF
USF
UCONN
.... these make sense for the eastern part of the conference. If you actually ranked these schools, you may put the two Florida schools on top. If WVU or Cincy balk, you go to UCONN (maybe a better value than either WVU or UC because they're nationally relevant in hoops) and maybe add someone from either the middle of the country, or the west.
Memphis
Tulane
Colorado State
.... make sense for the middle part of the country
San Diego State
Washington State
Oregon State
Fresno State
UNLV
.... make sense for the west coast
|
|
12-24-2023 07:22 PM |
|
UCGrad1992
Legend
Posts: 31,951
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation: 2312
I Root For: Bearcats U
Location: North Carolina
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
Quit trying to save the ACC's pride. It's not happening. All I've heard from the experts for OVER ONE YEAR is how no one would ever join the B12. First, it was no way in hades Colorado would ever join. Then, no way Arizona or the remaining four corners would ever join. Way more valuable to stay in the P12. Right! Except you were wrong. There is strength in numbers and a strong connection in hoops is why the B12 will become the remaining power conference after the B1G/SEC. We also have Brett Yormark, yet again, the so called experts have ripped him from day one and yet here we are. Some of you ACC dreamers need to see reality. No one is leaving the B12 for a conference that invited Cal and Stanford for a reduced rate and SMU for a bargain basement price less FSU, UNC, Clemson, et. al. Not happening. Get over it.
|
|
12-24-2023 07:39 PM |
|
Big 12 fan too
1st String
Posts: 1,660
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 210
I Root For: NIU
Location:
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
UConn, USF, or Tulane. They’ll likely wait to see if they can get a Big 12 invite, but like SMU/Cal won’t, and end up on a gutted ACC
|
|
12-24-2023 07:47 PM |
|
chess
Heisman
Posts: 6,843
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 219
I Root For: ECU & Nebraska
Location: Chicago Metro
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
When Florida State leaves, other ACC schools may leave. It is best to wait and see.
SEC and Big Ten can lead and determine how these schools should operate.
All conferences may implode, and a replacement for the NCAA may follow.
|
|
12-24-2023 07:51 PM |
|
Dull Impact
Water Engineer
Posts: 34
Joined: Sep 2023
Reputation: 13
I Root For: UGA, Pac Remnants
Location:
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
If the goal is a crumbling ACC, then you need below 15 teams for ESPN to have the ability to renegotiate, and for ESPN to choose to open up the contract. Not sure that happens, I think ESPN only pays more for SEC if there is expansion into new states (ie. NC/VA) other than that what is the financial pull? Make SEC teams give up some funds? Might be more cost effective to try to keep the ACC together and make Fox be the cause with them, ESPN, coming in on their white horse (easier for Disney to explain to the shareholders pushing hard for more net income).
(This post was last modified: 12-24-2023 08:42 PM by Dull Impact.)
|
|
12-24-2023 08:17 PM |
|
JSUCleburneslim
Special Teams
Posts: 606
Joined: Jan 2022
Reputation: 53
I Root For: Jax State
Location:
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
The acc having lost 6 or 8 schools will have to reach downward to replace as have everyone. So the Big12 teams will remain in the big12 leaving the acc to add AAC MWC CUSA sbc or Mac schools
|
|
12-24-2023 09:44 PM |
|
BullsFanInTX
Hall of Famer
Posts: 10,485
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 338
I Root For: USF
Location:
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
(12-24-2023 07:06 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote: (12-24-2023 06:51 PM)BullsFanInTX Wrote: USF, Tulane, and UConn seem like the most logical choices. Also, try to peel off Cincinnati, UCF, or West Virginia from the Big 12.
No one is peeling off from the B12 to join a watered down ACC. FSU won't be the only team leaving...
Notice I said try. I didn’t say it would be successful.
|
|
12-25-2023 12:08 AM |
|
ChrisLords
Heisman
Posts: 8,686
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 339
I Root For: Virginia Tech
Location: Earth
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
No Expansion seems like a no brainer. If FSU leaves there will be 16 teams in the conference. That's a great number for a conference.
If you have to go to 18 and don't want to wait until B12 teams become available, go with USF and Tulane. I could be convinced to swap out one of those 2 for UConn as well.
(This post was last modified: 12-25-2023 01:02 AM by ChrisLords.)
|
|
12-25-2023 12:33 AM |
|
DavidSt
Hall of Famer
Posts: 23,133
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 884
I Root For: ATU, P7
Location:
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
Buffalo, UAB, Temple, Navy for Notre Dame to stay, Rice, Tulane, Memphis, USF, ODU, Villanova, Delaware, UTSA, Georgia State, Stony Brook, Colorado State, New Mexico, UNLV or UNR, San Diego State, Utah State are all R1 schools.
UTSA and the UT medical school in San Antonio are being looked at on how to merged the two together. That would jump the UTSA standings in academics big time.
|
|
12-25-2023 12:47 AM |
|
random asian guy
All American
Posts: 3,272
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 342
I Root For: VT, Georgetown
Location:
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
I have been saying a maximum of two ACC schools would leave before the GoR expires and I still stand by that position.
We will see but I don’t think the ACC will not easily settle.
|
|
12-25-2023 01:01 AM |
|
random asian guy
All American
Posts: 3,272
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 342
I Root For: VT, Georgetown
Location:
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
(12-24-2023 07:09 PM)bryanw1995 Wrote: I voted Memphis, they’re ready to go day 1 and they bring a new and very enthusiastic market. USF is 2nd just bc they’re a reasonable Florida backfill.
Personally I think Memphis would be a great add for the B12.
|
|
12-25-2023 01:03 AM |
|
joeben69
1st String
Posts: 1,008
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation: 45
I Root For: sdsu, ucsd, usd
Location:
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
(12-24-2023 06:51 PM)BullsFanInTX Wrote: USF, Tulane, and UConn seem like the most logical choices. Also, try to peel off Cincinnati, UCF, or West Virginia from the Big 12.
LIKE ^^^
IF ACC loses 6-8 teams (depending on which teams) THEN
B12 ===> ACC
Cincinnati (R1), UCF (R1), West Virginia (R1)
> Cincinnati, UCF, West Virginia are offered a more regional P4 conference choice...
ACC ===> B12
Cal, Stanford, SMU
>Cal, Stanford, SMU show the same loyalty to the ACC as they did to their old conferences and bail for the B12 for the three (3) vacated B12 spots...
AAC ===> ACC
USF (AAU), Tulane (AAU), Memphis (R1), UConn (R1)
> USF, Tulane, Memphis, UConn given their opportunity to play with the ACC left behinds...
|
|
12-25-2023 01:52 AM |
|
RUScarlets
Heisman
Posts: 7,218
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 176
I Root For: Rutgers
Location:
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
The equation for the ACC is does ESPN find it still valuable enough without UNC FSU Clemson Miami (most likely first four out)?
I don’t see how that is an AQ conference. There is just nothing that’s on par with even Big 12 pro-rata value. Literally every penny of the settlement would have to be used if they have a prayer to bring in Big 12 east teams. Stanford and Cal prevents this almost 95% given the travel obligations (even subsidized). If the Big 12 Presidents are incentivized to let go of eastern teams it’s possible, but I don’t see a mechanism at this point. Are the PAC2 more valuable than UL and Pitt? No.
Following the first four, I suspect UL Pitt GaTech will go to the Big 12. Duke/NCSU (or both) and VAs (one or both) will also head there. That’s over 20 schools though. Do they look at ‘Cuse and UConn or would Fox rather bolster the Big East package and let ESPN figure out the football for the remaining privates? Either way, I see the Big 12 going over 21 schools.
(This post was last modified: 12-25-2023 04:12 AM by RUScarlets.)
|
|
12-25-2023 04:07 AM |
|
Jackson1011
Moderator
Posts: 7,867
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 170
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
(12-24-2023 04:26 PM)OldGoldnBlue Wrote: WVU admins have zero desire to move to the ACC, especially now. 10 years ago yes, now, no shot.
There it is^^. No one even knows if espn will opt out of its deal with acc or not in 2027 or whatever year. Besides it seems clear to me that the acc is evolving into a private school league, with prob Tulane and Rice on the way.
I bet Duke, Stanford, BC, Wake, SMU etc would be very comfortable with that type of setup. However WVU doesn’t need or want to be in a league like that.
Jackson
(This post was last modified: 12-25-2023 07:52 AM by Jackson1011.)
|
|
12-25-2023 07:34 AM |
|
Bluedevil16
2nd String
Posts: 262
Joined: May 2021
Reputation: 13
I Root For: Duke
Location:
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
Memphis seems quite logical. Good basketball, decent football, new state, plan to upgrade facilities.
|
|
12-26-2023 03:09 PM |
|
bryanw1995
+12 Hackmaster
Posts: 13,403
Joined: Jul 2022
Reputation: 1408
I Root For: A&M
Location: San Antonio
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
(12-24-2023 07:22 PM)Pervis_Griffith Wrote: If the ACC's Grant of Rights get pierced, then anyone's Grant of Rights can be pierced.
Big XII schools will definitely be poachable, and I see that as more likely than not.
The new ACC will be flush with exit fees .... and the price to get out will have been established. FSU is saying that's almost $600 million dollars. NONE of the schools tabbed for the Big XII will spend that kind of coin to go make the same money they're making now.
WVU
Cincy
UCF
USF
UCONN
.... these make sense for the eastern part of the conference. If you actually ranked these schools, you may put the two Florida schools on top. If WVU or Cincy balk, you go to UCONN (maybe a better value than either WVU or UC because they're nationally relevant in hoops) and maybe add someone from either the middle of the country, or the west.
Memphis
Tulane
Colorado State
.... make sense for the middle part of the country
San Diego State
Washington State
Oregon State
Fresno State
UNLV
.... make sense for the west coast
You contradict yourself. "nobody will spend $600m to make the same money" followed by a list that includes several big 12 schools that are surprisingly interested in joining an unstable conference that's ripe for more defections, just so they can make a little bit more until 2031, followed by about the same or perhaps a bit less from 2031 to 2036, followed by membership in the Magnolia Conference.
|
|
12-26-2023 03:36 PM |
|
bryanw1995
+12 Hackmaster
Posts: 13,403
Joined: Jul 2022
Reputation: 1408
I Root For: A&M
Location: San Antonio
|
RE: Who should the ACC add?
(12-25-2023 01:03 AM)random asian guy Wrote: (12-24-2023 07:09 PM)bryanw1995 Wrote: I voted Memphis, they’re ready to go day 1 and they bring a new and very enthusiastic market. USF is 2nd just bc they’re a reasonable Florida backfill.
Personally I think Memphis would be a great add for the B12.
Yeah, Memphis is ready day one for either of the M2, but the Big 12 doesn't need any more right now. It's funny, I always thought their best shot was the Big 12, then the Pac, with the ACC a distant hope for the far future, but that future could be here much sooner than most of us expected.
|
|
12-26-2023 04:06 PM |
|