(08-20-2013 03:16 PM)JHG722 Wrote:  

(08-20-2013 05:24 AM)CardFan1 Wrote:  We didn't say Louisville fans got the Big head after a couple of good years in Basketball.sorry, You did!

I meant football especially.

Again...... unlike Rutgers, My Cardinals have a reason to strut our stuff!!
You seem to have a problem with teams who are successful and actually talk about it..?
FlossY out...

(08-20-2013 10:47 PM)Marge Schott Wrote:  

(08-19-2013 09:19 PM)CardFan1 Wrote:  

(08-19-2013 09:02 PM)Marge Schott Wrote:  

(08-19-2013 07:55 PM)texasorange Wrote:  Um, how did this thread evolve into a Louisville vs. Temple thread?

Because even more than Pitt and Cuse fans, UL fans think they're god's gift to everything. A year ago EVERY single person on this board was mocking UL. Today UL is mocking every school/fan that they deem inferior to them. Idiots.

Whatever

You don't believe me? Nobody wanted you. At all. Then when Maryland left and people thought they might get stuck with UConn they prayed for the lesser of two evils.

Fact.

I'm not sure I ever said Syracuse was the "Gods gift" to anything. I am very mindful of the challenges the Orange face, but I am also very much aware of what we can achieve. Not sure why you are now taking a shot at me. I appreciate what Florida State has accomplished.

I wanted Louisville from the git-go but I guess northern teams fans' opinions don't count.

(08-22-2013 10:39 AM)TexanMark Wrote:  I wanted Louisville from the git-go but I guess northern teams fans' opinions don't count.

I liked Your opinion Mark!

I would rather have UMD as they fit ACC culture/geography MUCH better, but UL has a fantastic athletic dept. that is very competitive and makes a crazy amount of money, so I'm OK w/ the trade.

Also, adding UL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding UCONN.

(08-23-2013 01:58 PM)nzmorange Wrote:  I would rather have UMD as they fit ACC culture/geography MUCH better, but UL has a fantastic athletic dept. that is very competitive and makes a crazy amount of money, so I'm OK w/ the trade.

Also, adding UL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding UCONN.

Avogadro says: Louisville is 6.02 X 10^23 better than Connecticut

(08-23-2013 02:44 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  

(08-23-2013 01:58 PM)nzmorange Wrote:  I would rather have UMD as they fit ACC culture/geography MUCH better, but UL has a fantastic athletic dept. that is very competitive and makes a crazy amount of money, so I'm OK w/ the trade.

Also, adding UL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding UCONN.

Avogadro says: Louisville is 6.02 X 10^23 better than Connecticut

That's actually pretty funny and someone knows their chemistry. In high school, I was too busy trying to wrap my head around "i" being the square root of negative one to ever have any idea what was going on in chem. I still have nightmares about it, and you just resurfaced more than one traumatic memory. However, on the bright side, I now have a reason to drink

I wanted both Maryland and Louisville.

Go to 15 in FB. Damn Maryland for leaving.

UConn football sucks, blown out by Towson in football tonight.

Good thing the snob schools in the conference for once didn't get their way in wanting UConn. The Big 10 can have them.

I think They will remain in AAC for a long time.

(08-30-2013 06:38 AM)Ragu Wrote:  Good thing the snob schools in the conference for once didn't get their way in wanting UConn. The Big 10 can have them.

In fact, I HOPE the Big Ten takes UConn. That ought to drag them down...

(08-30-2013 07:53 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  

(08-30-2013 06:38 AM)Ragu Wrote:  Good thing the snob schools in the conference for once didn't get their way in wanting UConn. The Big 10 can have them.

In fact, I HOPE the Big Ten takes UConn. That ought to drag them down...

They already took football dead-weight in Rutgers and Maryland. Not sure they could afford to add another bottom dweller.

(08-30-2013 08:10 AM)WNCOrange Wrote:  

(08-30-2013 07:53 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  

(08-30-2013 06:38 AM)Ragu Wrote:  Good thing the snob schools in the conference for once didn't get their way in wanting UConn. The Big 10 can have them.

In fact, I HOPE the Big Ten takes UConn. That ought to drag them down...

They already took football dead-weight in Rutgers and Maryland. Not sure they could afford to add another bottom dweller.

and yet they still claim to play "Big" football!!?! If people call the ACC out on underperforming then the B1G should be as well.
FlossY out...