I think this poor guy might be on tilt. He even makes his own Shocker skin lotion at this point for his uncommonly soft little hands.

(12-27-2017 08:25 PM)payday Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 04:58 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 04:54 PM)PonyUpTempo Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 02:16 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 01:27 PM)mustangxc Wrote:  Flagship teams don't need others to do their dirty work for them.

Win a game in the tournament and then get back to me.

I’ll take a regular season conference championship and tournament championship over losing in the round of 32 any day. We sit here talking about championships, you guys won’t shut up about losing to Kentucky.

Oh dear God. You didn’t just say you’d take a meaningless, cosmetic regular season championship over NCAA tournament victories, did you? Please say you didn’t.

We have a Creighton ideaology alert. I repeat, we have a Creighton ideaology alert.




For the record, we have more than our fair share of conference titles AND NCAA tournament victories. And it’s not even close. I can’t believe you’re embarrassing your program and the AAC like you are. Please tell me not all SMU fans think this. Good God.

Cincinnati in Tourney... 16 wins over .500

WSU in Tourney......... 18 wins total

Again not arguing total history. Although I believe we have a pretty decent record in the tourney compared to everyone in the conference since we started our run in 2012. Perhaps I am wrong.

And I agree. 2nd weekend and beyond is what is real special. I just still feel if you gave me a choice this year of either a conference championship or at least 1 win in the tourney. I would pick AT LEAST 1 win in the tourney. For one, it does more for the conference. While it doesn't make the conference rich, it does more for the conference financially than just winning the conference championship.

(12-27-2017 08:27 PM)AndShock Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 08:25 PM)payday Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 04:58 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 04:54 PM)PonyUpTempo Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 02:16 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  Win a game in the tournament and then get back to me.

I’ll take a regular season conference championship and tournament championship over losing in the round of 32 any day. We sit here talking about championships, you guys won’t shut up about losing to Kentucky.

Oh dear God. You didn’t just say you’d take a meaningless, cosmetic regular season championship over NCAA tournament victories, did you? Please say you didn’t.

We have a Creighton ideaology alert. I repeat, we have a Creighton ideaology alert.




For the record, we have more than our fair share of conference titles AND NCAA tournament victories. And it’s not even close. I can’t believe you’re embarrassing your program and the AAC like you are. Please tell me not all SMU fans think this. Good God.

Cincinnati in Tourney... 16 wins over .500

WSU in Tourney......... 18 wins total

You’re mentally deficient.

Cincinnati... 14 straight tourney appearances

WSU......... 14 appearances total


WSU is Tourney deficient.

(12-27-2017 08:31 PM)payday Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 08:27 PM)AndShock Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 08:25 PM)payday Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 04:58 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 04:54 PM)PonyUpTempo Wrote:  I’ll take a regular season conference championship and tournament championship over losing in the round of 32 any day. We sit here talking about championships, you guys won’t shut up about losing to Kentucky.

Oh dear God. You didn’t just say you’d take a meaningless, cosmetic regular season championship over NCAA tournament victories, did you? Please say you didn’t.

We have a Creighton ideaology alert. I repeat, we have a Creighton ideaology alert.




For the record, we have more than our fair share of conference titles AND NCAA tournament victories. And it’s not even close. I can’t believe you’re embarrassing your program and the AAC like you are. Please tell me not all SMU fans think this. Good God.

Cincinnati in Tourney... 16 wins over .500

WSU in Tourney......... 18 wins total

You’re mentally deficient.

Cincinnati... 14 straight tourney appearances

WSU......... 14 appearances total


WSU is Tourney deficient.

Your knowledge of tourney history seems a bit deficient...

(12-27-2017 08:31 PM)payday Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 08:27 PM)AndShock Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 08:25 PM)payday Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 04:58 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 04:54 PM)PonyUpTempo Wrote:  I’ll take a regular season conference championship and tournament championship over losing in the round of 32 any day. We sit here talking about championships, you guys won’t shut up about losing to Kentucky.

Oh dear God. You didn’t just say you’d take a meaningless, cosmetic regular season championship over NCAA tournament victories, did you? Please say you didn’t.

We have a Creighton ideaology alert. I repeat, we have a Creighton ideaology alert.




For the record, we have more than our fair share of conference titles AND NCAA tournament victories. And it’s not even close. I can’t believe you’re embarrassing your program and the AAC like you are. Please tell me not all SMU fans think this. Good God.

Cincinnati in Tourney... 16 wins over .500

WSU in Tourney......... 18 wins total

You’re mentally deficient.

Cincinnati... 14 straight tourney appearances

WSU......... 14 appearances total


WSU is Tourney deficient.

Timely re-post:

(12-27-2017 08:57 AM)Play Angry Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 07:17 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  

(12-26-2017 11:04 PM)payday Wrote:  Just 3 more weeks in the AP and WSU ties New Mexico at #54 all time. Huge milestone. Congrats!

lulz

#bluebloods

<shouts "get off my lawn!" repeatedly.>

<has forgotten the bank foreclosed long ago, lawn now owned by strangers. unknowingly passes gas in frustration as perceived trespassers fail to yield to feeble commands.>

<casts unremembering gaze toward trophy case.>

<"damn kids have no respect. how has this thing not been updated? 1 sweet sixteen appearance in the last 16 years can't be right">

<unzips pants as focus shifts to half century old row on case, covered in dust. brief rush of blood quickly fades as realization sets in that queen city was last ranked above wichita state's 2017 peak (to date) when current recruits were not yet born.>

<mutters "damn shockers" as darkness surrounds. passes gas unknowingly again, not in frustration this time, but instead as a confused tip of the cap.>

<surrenders to sweet, sweet sleep.>

(12-27-2017 08:21 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  Anyone can win a single tournament game. IMO, making the second weekend (Sweet 16 or greater) is a season worth bragging about.

I agree in general, though WSU is one of only a couple of programs that's won at least one game in the NCAA tournament in each of the last five tournaments.

(12-27-2017 08:36 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 08:31 PM)payday Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 08:27 PM)AndShock Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 08:25 PM)payday Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 04:58 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  Oh dear God. You didn’t just say you’d take a meaningless, cosmetic regular season championship over NCAA tournament victories, did you? Please say you didn’t.

We have a Creighton ideaology alert. I repeat, we have a Creighton ideaology alert.




For the record, we have more than our fair share of conference titles AND NCAA tournament victories. And it’s not even close. I can’t believe you’re embarrassing your program and the AAC like you are. Please tell me not all SMU fans think this. Good God.

Cincinnati in Tourney... 16 wins over .500

WSU in Tourney......... 18 wins total

You’re mentally deficient.

Cincinnati... 14 straight tourney appearances

WSU......... 14 appearances total


WSU is Tourney deficient.

Your knowledge of tourney history seems a bit deficient...

Really? How’s that?

(12-27-2017 08:38 PM)payday Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 08:36 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 08:31 PM)payday Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 08:27 PM)AndShock Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 08:25 PM)payday Wrote:  Cincinnati in Tourney... 16 wins over .500

WSU in Tourney......... 18 wins total

You’re mentally deficient.

Cincinnati... 14 straight tourney appearances

WSU......... 14 appearances total


WSU is Tourney deficient.

Your knowledge of tourney history seems a bit deficient...

Really? How’s that?

Cincinnati Basketball from 2006 to 2010.

How about Cincinnati from 1992-2005

UC is half way thru their 2nd run at it.

(12-27-2017 08:43 PM)payday Wrote:  How about Cincinnati from 1992-2005

Ah. Ok. My apologies. Didn't know where that 14 straight was coming from. Your current run is quite impressive.

For all my SMU friends getting beat down by WSU fans on their Tourney success. At least SMU will never lose twice as did WSU..in the same Tourney!

(12-27-2017 08:46 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 08:43 PM)payday Wrote:  How about Cincinnati from 1992-2005

Ah. Ok. My apologies. Didn't know where that 14 straight was coming from. Your current run is quite impressive.

All good. :)

(12-27-2017 08:48 PM)payday Wrote:  For all my SMU friends getting beat down by WSU fans on their Tourney success. At least SMU will never lose twice as did WSU..in the same Tourney!

umm SMU has accomplished that feat . . . twice.

(12-27-2017 08:54 PM)pvtlamb Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 08:48 PM)payday Wrote:  For all my SMU friends getting beat down by WSU fans on their Tourney success. At least SMU will never lose twice as did WSU..in the same Tourney!

umm SMU has accomplished that feat . . . twice.

Really? lol. Well then carry on.

(12-27-2017 04:58 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 04:54 PM)PonyUpTempo Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 02:16 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 01:27 PM)mustangxc Wrote:  Flagship teams don't need others to do their dirty work for them.

Win a game in the tournament and then get back to me.

I’ll take a regular season conference championship and tournament championship over losing in the round of 32 any day. We sit here talking about championships, you guys won’t shut up about losing to Kentucky.

Oh dear God. You didn’t just say you’d take a meaningless, cosmetic regular season championship over NCAA tournament victories, did you? Please say you didn’t.

We have a Creighton ideaology alert. I repeat, we have a Creighton ideaology alert.




For the record, we have more than our fair share of conference titles AND NCAA tournament victories. And it’s not even close. I can’t believe you’re embarrassing your program and the AAC like you are. Please tell me not all SMU fans think this. Good God.

So easy. And so much fun...

Cincy...11 straight Tourney wins

WSU....4 straight tourney wins

(12-27-2017 07:24 PM)PonyUpTempo Wrote:  Shamet is the greatest! We lost to Kentucky, and looked great doing it!

That's what you come back with after getting humiliated? lol

(12-27-2017 09:21 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 07:24 PM)PonyUpTempo Wrote:  Shamet is the greatest! We lost to Kentucky, and looked great doing it!

That's what you come back with after getting humiliated? lol

You’re a great tutor.

(12-27-2017 07:57 PM)PonyUpTempo Wrote:  Of course I would rather make it to the Sweet 16 and beyond. Just tired of hearing about how bad ass it was to lose in the round of 32 to Kentucky.

I actually haven't heard that thrown around in quite a while since you brought it up today. Maybe you're tired of the national pundits who are often talking about it. I can't remember the last time a WSU fan brought it up.

Maybe you're the one that needs to get over it.

Regardless, your credibility is now lost by saying conference championships supersede NCAA Tournament wins.

(12-27-2017 08:08 PM)payday Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 02:16 PM)ShockerFever Wrote:  

(12-27-2017 01:27 PM)mustangxc Wrote:  Flagship teams don't need others to do their dirty work for them.

Win a game in the tournament and then get back to me.

Tourney records...

Cincy... 45-29

WSU... 18-15

Where's SMU dipshit?